On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 21:13:02 -0600
Tom Zanussi wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Sat, 2013-12-21 at 22:07 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Tom,
> >
> > This is the changes I made to fix the reports that Fengguang's kbuild test
> > bot
> > found. I folded in your change that fixes the bug with -ENODEV
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 21:13:02 -0600
Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Hi Steve,
On Sat, 2013-12-21 at 22:07 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
Tom,
This is the changes I made to fix the reports that Fengguang's kbuild test
bot
found. I folded in your change that fixes the
Hi Steve,
On Sat, 2013-12-21 at 22:07 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Tom,
>
> This is the changes I made to fix the reports that Fengguang's kbuild test bot
> found. I folded in your change that fixes the bug with -ENODEV used in
> kernel.h.
>
These look fine to me, and I didn't see any
Hi Steve,
On Sat, 2013-12-21 at 22:07 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
Tom,
This is the changes I made to fix the reports that Fengguang's kbuild test bot
found. I folded in your change that fixes the bug with -ENODEV used in
kernel.h.
These look fine to me, and I didn't see any problems
Tom,
This is the changes I made to fix the reports that Fengguang's kbuild test bot
found. I folded in your change that fixes the bug with -ENODEV used in kernel.h.
Paul,
I've Cc'd you because the second patch is fixing up RCU notation. The filter
is protect by rcu_sched, and the first hunk of
Tom,
This is the changes I made to fix the reports that Fengguang's kbuild test bot
found. I folded in your change that fixes the bug with -ENODEV used in kernel.h.
Paul,
I've Cc'd you because the second patch is fixing up RCU notation. The filter
is protect by rcu_sched, and the first hunk of
6 matches
Mail list logo