On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 01:01:43PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 13 March 2018 at 10:38, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:13:26AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> On 13 March 2018 at 10:04, Greg KH wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 06:24:09PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >
On 13 March 2018 at 10:38, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:13:26AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 13 March 2018 at 10:04, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 06:24:09PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> >> On 2 March 2018 at 16:54, Greg KH wrote:
...
>> >> > Please test on
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:13:26AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 13 March 2018 at 10:04, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 06:24:09PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> On 2 March 2018 at 16:54, Greg KH wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 05:14:50PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> >> >>
>
On 13 March 2018 at 10:04, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 06:24:09PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 2 March 2018 at 16:54, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 05:14:50PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 03/01/2018 11:24 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> >> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 06:24:09PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 2 March 2018 at 16:54, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 05:14:50PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 03/01/2018 11:24 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 11:56:22AM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> >> >> Hi
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 09:31:29PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 09:25:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 02:26:34PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Really? Like what? Last I looked it's only about 300 or so patches.
> > Something like less than .5% of the no
On 2 March 2018 at 16:54, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 05:14:50PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/01/2018 11:24 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 11:56:22AM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>> >> Hi All,
>> >>
>> >> This backport patchset fixed the meltdown issue, it's origin
On 03/07/2018 01:25 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> I suggest looking at the backports in the android-common tree that are
> needed for this "feature" to work properly, and pull them out and test
> them if you really want it in your Linaro trees. If you think some of
> them should be added to the LTS kerne
>>> But really, I don't see this need as all ARM devices that I know of that
>>> are stuck on 4.9.y are already using the android-common tree. Same for
>>> 4.4.y. Do you know of any that are not, and that can not just use
>>> 4.14.y instead?
>>
>> There's way more to ARM than just Android system
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 09:25:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 02:26:34PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I'm not far enough into the details to comment on the specifics here;
> > there's other people in the CCs who are. Let's let people look at the
> > code and see if they think
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 02:26:34PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 02:08:59PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > I know there is lots more than Android to ARM, but the huge majority by
> > quantity is Android.
>
> > What I'm saying here is look at all of the backports that were requir
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 02:08:59PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> I know there is lots more than Android to ARM, but the huge majority by
> quantity is Android.
> What I'm saying here is look at all of the backports that were required
> to get this working in the android tree. It was non-trivial by a l
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 12:46:38PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 05:54:15PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 05:14:50PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> > > On 03/01/2018 11:24 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > > > And why are you making this patchset up? What is wrong with t
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 05:54:15PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 05:14:50PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> > On 03/01/2018 11:24 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > And why are you making this patchset up? What is wrong with the patches
> > > in the android-common tree for this?
> > We believe
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 05:14:50PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>
>
> On 03/01/2018 11:24 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 11:56:22AM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> This backport patchset fixed the meltdown issue, it's original branch:
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/li
On Fri, 02 Mar 2018 09:14:50 +,
Alex Shi wrote:
>
>
>
> On 03/01/2018 11:24 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 11:56:22AM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> This backport patchset fixed the meltdown issue, it's original branch:
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux
On 03/01/2018 11:24 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 11:56:22AM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This backport patchset fixed the meltdown issue, it's original branch:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/log/?h=kpti
>> A few dependency or fixingpa
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 11:56:22AM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This backport patchset fixed the meltdown issue, it's original branch:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/log/?h=kpti
> A few dependency or fixingpatches are also picked up, if they are necessary
On 02/28/2018 11:56 AM, Alex Shi wrote:
> The patchset also on repository:
> git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-stable.git lts-4.9-spectrevv2
Sorry, the correct branch address is here:
https://git.linaro.org/kernel/speculation-fixes-staging.git v4.9-meltdown
Thanks
Alex
Hi All,
This backport patchset fixed the meltdown issue, it's original branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/log/?h=kpti
A few dependency or fixingpatches are also picked up, if they are necessary
and no functional changes.
The patchset also on repository:
20 matches
Mail list logo
