Re: [PATCH 0/3] [GIT PULL][3.9] tracing: Fixes with flags and latency tracers

2013-03-14 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 17:33 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Anyway, here's hopefully my final series of changes for 3.9. > (Famous last words) And there's a bug in this patch set. Thanks to Fangguang's auto tests, it showed a bug in my new work, which points out a bug in this patch set. The

[PATCH 0/3] [GIT PULL][3.9] tracing: Fixes with flags and latency tracers

2013-03-14 Thread Steven Rostedt
Ingo, Seems that the more I work on my 3.10 queue, the more I stumble over 3.9 and long standing bugs :-p Here's yet another patch (set) that needs to go into 3.9 and stable. The first patch fixes a long standing bug where the changing of the trace options has absolutely no protection against

[PATCH 0/3] [GIT PULL][3.9] tracing: Fixes with flags and latency tracers

2013-03-14 Thread Steven Rostedt
Ingo, Seems that the more I work on my 3.10 queue, the more I stumble over 3.9 and long standing bugs :-p Here's yet another patch (set) that needs to go into 3.9 and stable. The first patch fixes a long standing bug where the changing of the trace options has absolutely no protection against

Re: [PATCH 0/3] [GIT PULL][3.9] tracing: Fixes with flags and latency tracers

2013-03-14 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 17:33 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: Anyway, here's hopefully my final series of changes for 3.9. (Famous last words) And there's a bug in this patch set. Thanks to Fangguang's auto tests, it showed a bug in my new work, which points out a bug in this patch set. The