On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:35:58PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>>
>> It's just an unification with /proc/modules. Why should we do any
>> difference between external and built-in modules? It's the same,
>> it's similar, it's better to parse when the
14.09.2014, 22:56, "Greg KH" :
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:35:58PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>> On 14.09.2014 22:13, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:05:46PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
On 14.09.2014 21:39, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 09:31:58PM +0400, Kiri
On 2014-09-14 19:31, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> For example, when I compile "loop" module built-in and "loop" is in
> /etc/modules, init script warns about this module is not present and
> can't be autoloaded. The script does not store CONFIG_XXX <-> module_xxx
> conformity. And nobody stores it.
You m
On 2014-09-14 17:38, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 02:18:13PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>> This series implements a possibility to show the list of built-in drivers
>> to userspace. The names of drivers will be the same as when they are modules.
>
> Have you looked at /sys/modules/ ?
On 09/14, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>
> On 14.09.2014 21:27, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > That said, I do not really understand 2/3. Not only I do not understand
> > this kbuild magic, I am not sure I understand what /proc/built-in will
> > actually show.
>
> It's a list of drivers, one driver per line:
On 14.09.2014 22:12, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>> On 14.09.2014 21:27, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>> On 09/14, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 02:18:13PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> This series implements a possibility to show
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:35:58PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> On 14.09.2014 22:13, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:05:46PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> >> On 14.09.2014 21:39, Greg KH wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 09:31:58PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> On 14.09.2014 19:
On 14.09.2014 22:13, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:05:46PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>> On 14.09.2014 21:39, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 09:31:58PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
On 14.09.2014 19:38, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 02:18:13PM +0400, Kiril
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:05:46PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> On 14.09.2014 21:39, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 09:31:58PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> >> On 14.09.2014 19:38, Greg KH wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 02:18:13PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> This series imple
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> On 14.09.2014 21:27, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> On 09/14, Greg KH wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 02:18:13PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
This series implements a possibility to show the list of built-in drivers
to userspace. The n
On 14.09.2014 21:39, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 09:31:58PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>> On 14.09.2014 19:38, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 02:18:13PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
This series implements a possibility to show the list of built-in drivers
to userspa
On 14.09.2014 21:27, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 09/14, Greg KH wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 02:18:13PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>>> This series implements a possibility to show the list of built-in drivers
>>> to userspace. The names of drivers will be the same as when they are
>>> module
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 09:31:58PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> On 14.09.2014 19:38, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 02:18:13PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> >> This series implements a possibility to show the list of built-in drivers
> >> to userspace. The names of drivers will be the sa
On 14.09.2014 19:38, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 02:18:13PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>> This series implements a possibility to show the list of built-in drivers
>> to userspace. The names of drivers will be the same as when they are modules.
>
> Have you looked at /sys/modules/ ?
On 09/14, Greg KH wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 02:18:13PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> > This series implements a possibility to show the list of built-in drivers
> > to userspace. The names of drivers will be the same as when they are
> > modules.
>
> Have you looked at /sys/modules/ ? Doe
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 02:18:13PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> This series implements a possibility to show the list of built-in drivers
> to userspace. The names of drivers will be the same as when they are modules.
Have you looked at /sys/modules/ ? Doesn't that show what you want
here?
> So,
This series implements a possibility to show the list of built-in drivers
to userspace. The names of drivers will be the same as when they are modules.
So, if your system has "loop" driver then it appears either in /proc/modules
or in /proc/built-in and userspace will be able to know about this.
N
17 matches
Mail list logo
