Re: [PATCH 0/3] btrfs: ENOMEM bugfixes

2015-02-20 Thread Josef Bacik
On 02/20/2015 04:20 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 02:51:06AM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote: Hi, As it turns out, running with low memory is a really easy way to shake out undesirable behavior in Btrfs. This can be especially bad when considering that a memory limit is really eas

Re: [PATCH 0/3] btrfs: ENOMEM bugfixes

2015-02-20 Thread Omar Sandoval
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 02:51:06AM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote: > Hi, > > As it turns out, running with low memory is a really easy way to shake > out undesirable behavior in Btrfs. This can be especially bad when > considering that a memory limit is really easy to hit in a container > (e.g., by us

[PATCH 0/3] btrfs: ENOMEM bugfixes

2015-02-17 Thread Omar Sandoval
Hi, As it turns out, running with low memory is a really easy way to shake out undesirable behavior in Btrfs. This can be especially bad when considering that a memory limit is really easy to hit in a container (e.g., by using cgroup memory.limit_in_bytes). Here's a simple script that can hit seve