Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: bcm2835: critical clocks and parent selection

2016-05-12 Thread Eric Anholt
Martin Sperl writes: > On 10.05.2016, at 21:58, Martin Sperl wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 10.05.2016, at 19:37, Eric Anholt wrote: >>> >>> Martin Sperl writes: >>> > On 10.05.2016 03:01, Eric Anholt

Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: bcm2835: critical clocks and parent selection

2016-05-12 Thread Eric Anholt
Martin Sperl writes: > On 10.05.2016, at 21:58, Martin Sperl wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 10.05.2016, at 19:37, Eric Anholt wrote: >>> >>> Martin Sperl writes: >>> > On 10.05.2016 03:01, Eric Anholt wrote: > With the new patch 2 inserted between my previous pair, I think this >

Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: bcm2835: critical clocks and parent selection

2016-05-12 Thread Eric Anholt
Martin Sperl writes: >> On 10.05.2016, at 19:37, Eric Anholt wrote: >> >> Martin Sperl writes: >>> and also hsm (probably hardware security module): >>> root@raspcm:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/clk/hsm/regdump >>> ctl = 0x02d6

Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: bcm2835: critical clocks and parent selection

2016-05-12 Thread Eric Anholt
Martin Sperl writes: >> On 10.05.2016, at 19:37, Eric Anholt wrote: >> >> Martin Sperl writes: >>> and also hsm (probably hardware security module): >>> root@raspcm:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/clk/hsm/regdump >>> ctl = 0x02d6 >>> div = 0x30e0 >>> root@raspcm:~# cat

Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: bcm2835: critical clocks and parent selection

2016-05-11 Thread Martin Sperl
> On 11.05.2016, at 10:21, Martin Sperl wrote: > > On 10.05.2016, at 21:58, Martin Sperl wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 10.05.2016, at 19:37, Eric Anholt wrote: >>> >>> Martin Sperl writes: >>> > On

Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: bcm2835: critical clocks and parent selection

2016-05-11 Thread Martin Sperl
> On 11.05.2016, at 10:21, Martin Sperl wrote: > > On 10.05.2016, at 21:58, Martin Sperl wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 10.05.2016, at 19:37, Eric Anholt wrote: >>> >>> Martin Sperl writes: >>> > On 10.05.2016 03:01, Eric Anholt wrote: > With the new patch 2 inserted between my previous

Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: bcm2835: critical clocks and parent selection

2016-05-11 Thread Martin Sperl
On 10.05.2016, at 21:58, Martin Sperl wrote: > > > >> On 10.05.2016, at 19:37, Eric Anholt wrote: >> >> Martin Sperl writes: >> On 10.05.2016 03:01, Eric Anholt wrote: With the new patch 2 inserted between my

Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: bcm2835: critical clocks and parent selection

2016-05-11 Thread Martin Sperl
On 10.05.2016, at 21:58, Martin Sperl wrote: > > > >> On 10.05.2016, at 19:37, Eric Anholt wrote: >> >> Martin Sperl writes: >> On 10.05.2016 03:01, Eric Anholt wrote: With the new patch 2 inserted between my previous pair, I think this should cover Martin's bugs with clock

Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: bcm2835: critical clocks and parent selection

2016-05-10 Thread Martin Sperl
> On 10.05.2016, at 19:37, Eric Anholt wrote: > > Martin Sperl writes: > >>> On 10.05.2016 03:01, Eric Anholt wrote: >>> With the new patch 2 inserted between my previous pair, I think this >>> should cover Martin's bugs with clock disabling. >>>

Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: bcm2835: critical clocks and parent selection

2016-05-10 Thread Martin Sperl
> On 10.05.2016, at 19:37, Eric Anholt wrote: > > Martin Sperl writes: > >>> On 10.05.2016 03:01, Eric Anholt wrote: >>> With the new patch 2 inserted between my previous pair, I think this >>> should cover Martin's bugs with clock disabling. >>> >>> I tested patch 2 to be important on the

Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: bcm2835: critical clocks and parent selection

2016-05-10 Thread Eric Anholt
Martin Sperl writes: > On 10.05.2016 03:01, Eric Anholt wrote: >> With the new patch 2 inserted between my previous pair, I think this >> should cover Martin's bugs with clock disabling. >> >> I tested patch 2 to be important on the downstream kernel: with the >> DPI

Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: bcm2835: critical clocks and parent selection

2016-05-10 Thread Eric Anholt
Martin Sperl writes: > On 10.05.2016 03:01, Eric Anholt wrote: >> With the new patch 2 inserted between my previous pair, I think this >> should cover Martin's bugs with clock disabling. >> >> I tested patch 2 to be important on the downstream kernel: with the >> DPI panel support added there, I

Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: bcm2835: critical clocks and parent selection

2016-05-10 Thread Martin Sperl
On 10.05.2016 03:01, Eric Anholt wrote: With the new patch 2 inserted between my previous pair, I think this should cover Martin's bugs with clock disabling. I tested patch 2 to be important on the downstream kernel: with the DPI panel support added there, I was losing ethernet (my only I/O)

Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: bcm2835: critical clocks and parent selection

2016-05-10 Thread Martin Sperl
On 10.05.2016 03:01, Eric Anholt wrote: With the new patch 2 inserted between my previous pair, I think this should cover Martin's bugs with clock disabling. I tested patch 2 to be important on the downstream kernel: with the DPI panel support added there, I was losing ethernet (my only I/O)

[PATCH 0/3] clk: bcm2835: critical clocks and parent selection

2016-05-09 Thread Eric Anholt
With the new patch 2 inserted between my previous pair, I think this should cover Martin's bugs with clock disabling. I tested patch 2 to be important on the downstream kernel: with the DPI panel support added there, I was losing ethernet (my only I/O) when the HDMI HSM hanging off of PLLD_PER

[PATCH 0/3] clk: bcm2835: critical clocks and parent selection

2016-05-09 Thread Eric Anholt
With the new patch 2 inserted between my previous pair, I think this should cover Martin's bugs with clock disabling. I tested patch 2 to be important on the downstream kernel: with the DPI panel support added there, I was losing ethernet (my only I/O) when the HDMI HSM hanging off of PLLD_PER