Re: [PATCH 0/3] core: fix build error when referencing arch specific structures

2007-09-07 Thread Mike Travis
Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Fri, 7 Sep 2007 08:28:05 +0100 Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Friday 07 September 2007 05:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Since the core kernel routines need to reference cpu_sibling_map, >>> whether it be a static array or a per_cpu data variable, an

Re: [PATCH 0/3] core: fix build error when referencing arch specific structures

2007-09-07 Thread Mike Travis
Andi Kleen wrote: > On Friday 07 September 2007 05:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Since the core kernel routines need to reference cpu_sibling_map, >> whether it be a static array or a per_cpu data variable, an access >> function has been defined. >> >> In addition, changes have been made to the

Re: [PATCH 0/3] core: fix build error when referencing arch specific structures

2007-09-07 Thread Andrew Morton
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2007 08:28:05 +0100 Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 07 September 2007 05:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Since the core kernel routines need to reference cpu_sibling_map, > > whether it be a static array or a per_cpu data variable, an access > > function has been

Re: [PATCH 0/3] core: fix build error when referencing arch specific structures

2007-09-07 Thread Andi Kleen
On Friday 07 September 2007 05:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Since the core kernel routines need to reference cpu_sibling_map, > whether it be a static array or a per_cpu data variable, an access > function has been defined. > > In addition, changes have been made to the ia64 and ppc64 arch's to

Re: [PATCH 0/3] core: fix build error when referencing arch specific structures

2007-09-07 Thread Andi Kleen
On Friday 07 September 2007 05:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since the core kernel routines need to reference cpu_sibling_map, whether it be a static array or a per_cpu data variable, an access function has been defined. In addition, changes have been made to the ia64 and ppc64 arch's to move

Re: [PATCH 0/3] core: fix build error when referencing arch specific structures

2007-09-07 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007 08:28:05 +0100 Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 07 September 2007 05:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since the core kernel routines need to reference cpu_sibling_map, whether it be a static array or a per_cpu data variable, an access function has been defined.

Re: [PATCH 0/3] core: fix build error when referencing arch specific structures

2007-09-07 Thread Mike Travis
Andrew Morton wrote: On Fri, 7 Sep 2007 08:28:05 +0100 Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 07 September 2007 05:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since the core kernel routines need to reference cpu_sibling_map, whether it be a static array or a per_cpu data variable, an access function

Re: [PATCH 0/3] core: fix build error when referencing arch specific structures

2007-09-07 Thread Mike Travis
Andi Kleen wrote: On Friday 07 September 2007 05:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since the core kernel routines need to reference cpu_sibling_map, whether it be a static array or a per_cpu data variable, an access function has been defined. In addition, changes have been made to the ia64 and

[PATCH 0/3] core: fix build error when referencing arch specific structures

2007-09-06 Thread travis
Since the core kernel routines need to reference cpu_sibling_map, whether it be a static array or a per_cpu data variable, an access function has been defined. In addition, changes have been made to the ia64 and ppc64 arch's to move the cpu_sibling_map from a static cpumask_t array [NR_CPUS] to

[PATCH 0/3] core: fix build error when referencing arch specific structures

2007-09-06 Thread travis
Since the core kernel routines need to reference cpu_sibling_map, whether it be a static array or a per_cpu data variable, an access function has been defined. In addition, changes have been made to the ia64 and ppc64 arch's to move the cpu_sibling_map from a static cpumask_t array [NR_CPUS] to