On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 20:34:58 -0300
> Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>
>
>> so in kcmdline we would have modulename.param instead of modulename.param=1?
>>
>> I guess we need to update kmod then, because currently we ignore and
>> treat this case as
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 20:34:58 -0300
>> Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>>
>>
>>> so in kcmdline we would have modulename.param instead of modulename.param=1?
>>>
>>> I guess we need to upda
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 20:34:58 -0300
Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> so in kcmdline we would have modulename.param instead of modulename.param=1?
>
> I guess we need to update kmod then, because currently we ignore and
> treat this case as a wrong token. From a quick look, allowing it in
> kmod would b
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Rusty,
>
> I'm looking at porting my "enable tracepoints in module load" patches
> and one of the comments you gave me (long ago) was to not have:
>
> trace_foo=1
>
> but to just have:
>
> trace_foo
>
> as a parameter name. I went and impl
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 17:02:28 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Rusty,
>
> I'm looking at porting my "enable tracepoints in module load" patches
> and one of the comments you gave me (long ago) was to not have:
>
> trace_foo=1
>
> but to just have:
>
> trace_foo
>
> as a parameter name. I went
Rusty,
I'm looking at porting my "enable tracepoints in module load" patches
and one of the comments you gave me (long ago) was to not have:
trace_foo=1
but to just have:
trace_foo
as a parameter name. I went and implemented this but discovered that the
functions that allow no arguments are
6 matches
Mail list logo