Re: [PATCH 0/3] pc104: Mask PC/104 Kconfig options

2017-03-15 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 05/03/17 12:48, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 01/03/17 20:46, William Breathitt Gray wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 04:26:19PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 7:50 PM, William Breathitt Gray >>> wrote: >>> PC/104 form factor devices serve a specific niche of embed

Re: [PATCH 0/3] pc104: Mask PC/104 Kconfig options

2017-03-05 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 01/03/17 20:46, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 04:26:19PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 7:50 PM, William Breathitt Gray >> wrote: >> >>> PC/104 form factor devices serve a specific niche of embedded system >>> users. Since PC/104 devices and har

Re: [PATCH 0/3] pc104: Mask PC/104 Kconfig options

2017-03-01 Thread William Breathitt Gray
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 04:26:19PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 7:50 PM, William Breathitt Gray > wrote: > >> PC/104 form factor devices serve a specific niche of embedded system >> users. Since PC/104 devices and hardware are typically used by just a >> subset of Linux user

Re: [PATCH 0/3] pc104: Mask PC/104 Kconfig options

2017-01-11 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 7:50 PM, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > PC/104 form factor devices serve a specific niche of embedded system > users. Since PC/104 devices and hardware are typically used by just a > subset of Linux users, it would be appropriate to filter PC/104 related > Kconfig options

[PATCH 0/3] pc104: Mask PC/104 Kconfig options

2017-01-10 Thread William Breathitt Gray
PC/104 form factor devices serve a specific niche of embedded system users. Since PC/104 devices and hardware are typically used by just a subset of Linux users, it would be appropriate to filter PC/104 related Kconfig options for those uninterested. This patchset introduces the PC104 Kconfig opti