On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:55:06PM +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 07:05:49PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > [3/3] regulator: unexport regulator_lock/unlock()
> > (no commit info)
> It looks like the third one didn't get in? (Can't see it in the
> for-next branch).
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 07:05:49PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 06:33:30 +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> > This removes regulator_lock/unlock() calls around
> > regulator_notifier_call_chain() as they are redundant - drivers
> > already have to guarantee regulator_dev's existence
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 06:33:30AM +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> This removes regulator_lock/unlock() calls around
> regulator_notifier_call_chain() as they are redundant - drivers
> already have to guarantee regulator_dev's existence during the call.
>
> This should make reasoing about the
This removes regulator_lock/unlock() calls around
regulator_notifier_call_chain() as they are redundant - drivers
already have to guarantee regulator_dev's existence during the call.
This should make reasoing about the lock easier, as this was the only
use outside regulator core code.
The only
4 matches
Mail list logo