On 2013/2/13 17:15, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:54:58 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Clark Williams wrote:
>>>
I figured that was coming. :)
>>>
>>> ;-)
>>>
I'll look at it again and see about pulling the
autogroup/cgroup
On 2013/2/13 17:15, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Namhyung Kim namhy...@kernel.org wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:54:58 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Clark Williams willi...@redhat.com wrote:
I figured that was coming. :)
;-)
I'll look at it again and see about pulling the
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:19:37 -0600, Clark Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:15:12 +0100
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> > On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:54:58 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> > > * Clark Williams wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> I figured that was coming. :)
>> > >
>> > > ;-)
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:15:12 +0100
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:54:58 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Clark Williams wrote:
> > >
> > >> I figured that was coming. :)
> > >
> > > ;-)
> > >
> > >> I'll look at it again and see about
* Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:54:58 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Clark Williams wrote:
> >
> >> I figured that was coming. :)
> >
> > ;-)
> >
> >> I'll look at it again and see about pulling the
> >> autogroup/cgroup stuff into it's own header. After that it's
>
* Namhyung Kim namhy...@kernel.org wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:54:58 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Clark Williams willi...@redhat.com wrote:
I figured that was coming. :)
;-)
I'll look at it again and see about pulling the
autogroup/cgroup stuff into it's own header.
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:15:12 +0100
Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Namhyung Kim namhy...@kernel.org wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:54:58 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Clark Williams willi...@redhat.com wrote:
I figured that was coming. :)
;-)
I'll look at
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:19:37 -0600, Clark Williams wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:15:12 +0100
Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Namhyung Kim namhy...@kernel.org wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:54:58 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Clark Williams willi...@redhat.com wrote:
I figured that
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:54:58 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Clark Williams wrote:
>
>> I figured that was coming. :)
>
> ;-)
>
>> I'll look at it again and see about pulling the
>> autogroup/cgroup stuff into it's own header. After that it's
>> probably going to require some serious
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:54:58 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Clark Williams willi...@redhat.com wrote:
I figured that was coming. :)
;-)
I'll look at it again and see about pulling the
autogroup/cgroup stuff into it's own header. After that it's
probably going to require some serious
* Clark Williams wrote:
> I figured that was coming. :)
;-)
> I'll look at it again and see about pulling the
> autogroup/cgroup stuff into it's own header. After that it's
> probably going to require some serious changes.
>
> Any suggestions?
I'd suggest doing it as finegrained as
* Clark Williams willi...@redhat.com wrote:
I figured that was coming. :)
;-)
I'll look at it again and see about pulling the
autogroup/cgroup stuff into it's own header. After that it's
probably going to require some serious changes.
Any suggestions?
I'd suggest doing it as
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 15:18:41 +0100
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Clark Williams wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 20:52:57 +0100
> > Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > * Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > * Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yeah, that looks pretty good.
> > > > >
>
* Clark Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 20:52:57 +0100
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> >
> > * Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > * Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yeah, that looks pretty good.
> > > >
> > > > I'll give it some testing.
> > >
> > > Found one build error so far, applied
* Clark Williams willi...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 20:52:57 +0100
Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
Yeah, that looks pretty good.
I'll give it some testing.
Found
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 15:18:41 +0100
Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Clark Williams willi...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 20:52:57 +0100
Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 20:52:57 +0100
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> >
> > * Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah, that looks pretty good.
> > >
> > > I'll give it some testing.
> >
> > Found one build error so far, applied the fix below.
>
> Another one was in NOMMU mode
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > Yeah, that looks pretty good.
> >
> > I'll give it some testing.
>
> Found one build error so far, applied the fix below.
Another one was in NOMMU mode (fixed below) - a hidden sched.h
include file dependency in mm/nommu.c.
It's
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Yeah, that looks pretty good.
>
> I'll give it some testing.
Found one build error so far, applied the fix below.
Thanks,
Ingo
---
kernel/mutex.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index: linux/kernel/mutex.c
* Clark Williams wrote:
>
> Ingo,
>
> Is this more in line with what you wanted?
>
> I moved the sysctl bits out into include/linux/sched/sysctl.h, then
> updated any source dependent on sysctl bits, then added my SCHED_RR
> tuning knob, then finally created include/linux/sched/rt.h to hold
Ingo,
Is this more in line with what you wanted?
I moved the sysctl bits out into include/linux/sched/sysctl.h, then
updated any source dependent on sysctl bits, then added my SCHED_RR
tuning knob, then finally created include/linux/sched/rt.h to hold
most of the rt scheduler specific bits.
* Clark Williams willi...@redhat.com wrote:
Ingo,
Is this more in line with what you wanted?
I moved the sysctl bits out into include/linux/sched/sysctl.h, then
updated any source dependent on sysctl bits, then added my SCHED_RR
tuning knob, then finally created
* Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
Yeah, that looks pretty good.
I'll give it some testing.
Found one build error so far, applied the fix below.
Thanks,
Ingo
---
kernel/mutex.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index: linux/kernel/mutex.c
* Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
Yeah, that looks pretty good.
I'll give it some testing.
Found one build error so far, applied the fix below.
Another one was in NOMMU mode (fixed below) - a hidden sched.h
include file dependency in
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 20:52:57 +0100
Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
Yeah, that looks pretty good.
I'll give it some testing.
Found one build error so far, applied the fix below.
Another
Ingo,
Is this more in line with what you wanted?
I moved the sysctl bits out into include/linux/sched/sysctl.h, then
updated any source dependent on sysctl bits, then added my SCHED_RR
tuning knob, then finally created include/linux/sched/rt.h to hold
most of the rt scheduler specific bits.
26 matches
Mail list logo