On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 15:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Here's three little shmem/tmpfs patches against v3.5-rc6.
> Either the first should go in before v3.5 final, or it should not go
> in at all. The second and third are independent of it: I'd like them
> in v3.5, but don't have a
Here's three little shmem/tmpfs patches against v3.5-rc6.
Either the first should go in before v3.5 final, or it should not go
in at all. The second and third are independent of it: I'd like them
in v3.5, but don't have a clinching argument: see what you think.
[PATCH 1/3] tmpfs: revert
Here's three little shmem/tmpfs patches against v3.5-rc6.
Either the first should go in before v3.5 final, or it should not go
in at all. The second and third are independent of it: I'd like them
in v3.5, but don't have a clinching argument: see what you think.
[PATCH 1/3] tmpfs: revert
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 15:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
Hugh Dickins hu...@google.com wrote:
Here's three little shmem/tmpfs patches against v3.5-rc6.
Either the first should go in before v3.5 final, or it should not go
in at all. The second and third are independent of it: I'd like them
in v3.5, but don't
4 matches
Mail list logo
