Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86/dumpstack: Print registers with the same log level as the backtrace

2020-06-25 Thread Dmitry Safonov
On 6/24/20 7:50 AM, Petr Mladek wrote: > On Tue 2020-06-23 17:29:55, Dmitry Safonov wrote: >> show_trace_log_lvl() provides x86 platform-specific way to unwind >> backtrace with a given log level. Unfortunately, registers dump(s) are >> not printed with the same log level - instead, KERN_DEFAULT

Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86/dumpstack: Print registers with the same log level as the backtrace

2020-06-24 Thread Petr Mladek
On Tue 2020-06-23 17:29:55, Dmitry Safonov wrote: > show_trace_log_lvl() provides x86 platform-specific way to unwind > backtrace with a given log level. Unfortunately, registers dump(s) are > not printed with the same log level - instead, KERN_DEFAULT is always > used. > > Arista's switches uses

[PATCH 0/3] x86/dumpstack: Print registers with the same log level as the backtrace

2020-06-23 Thread Dmitry Safonov
show_trace_log_lvl() provides x86 platform-specific way to unwind backtrace with a given log level. Unfortunately, registers dump(s) are not printed with the same log level - instead, KERN_DEFAULT is always used. Arista's switches uses quite common setup with rsyslog, where only urgent messages