Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: Reduce memory and intra-node effects with large count NR_CPUs fixup

On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Mike Travis wrote: > I hadn't considered doing 32-bit NUMA changes as I didn't know if the > NR_CPUS count would really be increased for the 32-bit architecture. > I have been trying though not to break it. ;-) 32bit NUMA is tricky because ZONE_NORMAL memory is only

Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: Reduce memory and intra-node effects with large count NR_CPUs fixup

Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Mike Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, >> >> My automatic scripts accidentally sent this mail prematurely. Please >> hold off applying yet. > > I've picked it up for x86.git and i'll keep testing it (the patches seem > straightforward) and will report

Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: Reduce memory and intra-node effects with large count NR_CPUs fixup

* Mike Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > My automatic scripts accidentally sent this mail prematurely. Please > hold off applying yet. I've picked it up for x86.git and i'll keep testing it (the patches seem straightforward) and will report any problems with the

Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: Reduce memory and intra-node effects with large count NR_CPUs fixup

* Mike Travis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Andrew, My automatic scripts accidentally sent this mail prematurely. Please hold off applying yet. I've picked it up for x86.git and i'll keep testing it (the patches seem straightforward) and will report any problems with the bite-head-off

Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: Reduce memory and intra-node effects with large count NR_CPUs fixup

On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Mike Travis wrote: I hadn't considered doing 32-bit NUMA changes as I didn't know if the NR_CPUS count would really be increased for the 32-bit architecture. I have been trying though not to break it. ;-) 32bit NUMA is tricky because ZONE_NORMAL memory is only available

Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: Reduce memory and intra-node effects with large count NR_CPUs fixup

Ingo Molnar wrote: * Mike Travis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Andrew, My automatic scripts accidentally sent this mail prematurely. Please hold off applying yet. I've picked it up for x86.git and i'll keep testing it (the patches seem straightforward) and will report any problems with

Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: Reduce memory and intra-node effects with large count NR_CPUs fixup

Hi Andrew, My automatic scripts accidentally sent this mail prematurely. Please hold off applying yet. Thanks, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Fixup change NR_CPUS patchset by rebasing on 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 (from > 2.6.24-rc6-mm1) > and adding last minute changes suggested by reviews. > > Based

[PATCH 0/3] x86: Reduce memory and intra-node effects with large count NR_CPUs fixup

Fixup change NR_CPUS patchset by rebasing on 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 (from 2.6.24-rc6-mm1) and adding last minute changes suggested by reviews. Based on 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- -- -- To unsubscribe from this

[PATCH 0/3] x86: Reduce memory and intra-node effects with large count NR_CPUs fixup

Fixup change NR_CPUS patchset by rebasing on 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 (from 2.6.24-rc6-mm1) and adding last minute changes suggested by reviews. Based on 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 Signed-off-by: Mike Travis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- -- To unsubscribe from this

Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: Reduce memory and intra-node effects with large count NR_CPUs fixup

Hi Andrew, My automatic scripts accidentally sent this mail prematurely. Please hold off applying yet. Thanks, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fixup change NR_CPUS patchset by rebasing on 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 (from 2.6.24-rc6-mm1) and adding last minute changes suggested by reviews. Based on