Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: unify crash_32/64.c

2007-10-26 Thread Hiroshi Shimamoto
Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: > Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: >> >> Added Venki to CC >> I'm now testing crash on 32bit, but there is an issue before applying the patches. My machine stopped at checking 'hlt' after kexec, showing below message. >>

Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: unify crash_32/64.c

2007-10-26 Thread Hiroshi Shimamoto
Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: > > Added Venki to CC > >>> I'm now testing crash on 32bit, but there is an issue before >>> applying the patches. My machine stopped at checking 'hlt' >>> after kexec, showing below message. >>> >>> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU

Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: unify crash_32/64.c

2007-10-26 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: Added Venki to CC > > I'm now testing crash on 32bit, but there is an issue before > > applying the patches. My machine stopped at checking 'hlt' > > after kexec, showing below message. > > > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.80GHz stepping 0a > > Check

Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: unify crash_32/64.c

2007-10-26 Thread Hiroshi Shimamoto
> I'm now testing crash on 32bit, but there is an issue before > applying the patches. My machine stopped at checking 'hlt' > after kexec, showing below message. > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.80GHz stepping 0a > Checking 'hlt' instruction... > > v2.6.23.1 works fine for 1st kernel. > I'm inves

Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: unify crash_32/64.c

2007-10-25 Thread Hiroshi Shimamoto
Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: > Vivek Goyal wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 06:18:27PM -0700, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I made patches to unify crash_32/64.c. >>> There are three patches; >>> 1. add lapic_shutdown for x86_64 >>> 2. add safe_smp_processor_id for x86_64 >>> 3. unify crash

Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: unify crash_32/64.c

2007-10-24 Thread Hiroshi Shimamoto
Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 06:18:27PM -0700, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I made patches to unify crash_32/64.c. >> There are three patches; >> 1. add lapic_shutdown for x86_64 >> 2. add safe_smp_processor_id for x86_64 >> 3. unify crash_32/64.c >> >> I'm not sure that it

Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: unify crash_32/64.c

2007-10-23 Thread Vivek Goyal
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 06:18:27PM -0700, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: > Hi, > > I made patches to unify crash_32/64.c. > There are three patches; > 1. add lapic_shutdown for x86_64 > 2. add safe_smp_processor_id for x86_64 > 3. unify crash_32/64.c > > I'm not sure that it's good to split to these pa

Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: unify crash_32/64.c

2007-10-20 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: > Hi, > > I made patches to unify crash_32/64.c. > There are three patches; > 1. add lapic_shutdown for x86_64 > 2. add safe_smp_processor_id for x86_64 > 3. unify crash_32/64.c > > I'm not sure that it's good to split to these patches. It's fine. S

[PATCH 0/3] x86: unify crash_32/64.c

2007-10-19 Thread Hiroshi Shimamoto
Hi, I made patches to unify crash_32/64.c. There are three patches; 1. add lapic_shutdown for x86_64 2. add safe_smp_processor_id for x86_64 3. unify crash_32/64.c I'm not sure that it's good to split to these patches. I've compiled on both of 32bit and 64bit, and tested kdump on 64bit. Thanks