Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
>>
>> Added Venki to CC
>>
I'm now testing crash on 32bit, but there is an issue before
applying the patches. My machine stopped at checking 'hlt'
after kexec, showing below message.
>>
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
>
> Added Venki to CC
>
>>> I'm now testing crash on 32bit, but there is an issue before
>>> applying the patches. My machine stopped at checking 'hlt'
>>> after kexec, showing below message.
>>>
>>> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
Added Venki to CC
> > I'm now testing crash on 32bit, but there is an issue before
> > applying the patches. My machine stopped at checking 'hlt'
> > after kexec, showing below message.
> >
> > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.80GHz stepping 0a
> > Check
> I'm now testing crash on 32bit, but there is an issue before
> applying the patches. My machine stopped at checking 'hlt'
> after kexec, showing below message.
>
> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.80GHz stepping 0a
> Checking 'hlt' instruction...
>
> v2.6.23.1 works fine for 1st kernel.
> I'm inves
Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 06:18:27PM -0700, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I made patches to unify crash_32/64.c.
>>> There are three patches;
>>> 1. add lapic_shutdown for x86_64
>>> 2. add safe_smp_processor_id for x86_64
>>> 3. unify crash
Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 06:18:27PM -0700, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I made patches to unify crash_32/64.c.
>> There are three patches;
>> 1. add lapic_shutdown for x86_64
>> 2. add safe_smp_processor_id for x86_64
>> 3. unify crash_32/64.c
>>
>> I'm not sure that it
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 06:18:27PM -0700, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I made patches to unify crash_32/64.c.
> There are three patches;
> 1. add lapic_shutdown for x86_64
> 2. add safe_smp_processor_id for x86_64
> 3. unify crash_32/64.c
>
> I'm not sure that it's good to split to these pa
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I made patches to unify crash_32/64.c.
> There are three patches;
> 1. add lapic_shutdown for x86_64
> 2. add safe_smp_processor_id for x86_64
> 3. unify crash_32/64.c
>
> I'm not sure that it's good to split to these patches.
It's fine. S
Hi,
I made patches to unify crash_32/64.c.
There are three patches;
1. add lapic_shutdown for x86_64
2. add safe_smp_processor_id for x86_64
3. unify crash_32/64.c
I'm not sure that it's good to split to these patches.
I've compiled on both of 32bit and 64bit, and tested
kdump on 64bit.
Thanks
9 matches
Mail list logo