> On Mar 23, 2021, at 10:45 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:08:51PM +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
My results show that, because svc_alloc_arg() ends up calling
__alloc_pages_bulk() twice in this case, it ends up being
twice as expensive as the
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:08:14 +0100
Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 10:44:21 +
> Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 09:18:42AM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > This series is based on top of Matthew Wilcox's series "Rationalise
> > > __alloc_pages wrapper"
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 04:08:14PM +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 10:44:21 +
> Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 09:18:42AM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > This series is based on top of Matthew Wilcox's series "Rationalise
> > > __alloc_pages
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 10:44:21 +
Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 09:18:42AM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > This series is based on top of Matthew Wilcox's series "Rationalise
> > __alloc_pages wrapper" and does not apply to 5.12-rc2. If you want to
> > test and are not using Andrew's
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:08:51PM +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > >
> > > My results show that, because svc_alloc_arg() ends up calling
> > > __alloc_pages_bulk() twice in this case, it ends up being
> > > twice as expensive as the list case, on average, for the same
> > > workload.
> >
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 08:32:54PM +, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> > It's not expected that the array implementation would be worse *unless*
> > you are passing in arrays with holes in the middle. Otherwise, the success
> > rate should be similar.
>
> Essentially, sunrpc will always pass an array
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 20:58:27 +
Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 08:32:54PM +, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> > >> It is returning some confusing (to me) results. I'd like
> > >> to get these resolved before posting any benchmark
> > >> results.
> > >>
> > >> 1. When it has visited
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 09:18:42AM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> This series is based on top of Matthew Wilcox's series "Rationalise
> __alloc_pages wrapper" and does not apply to 5.12-rc2. If you want to
> test and are not using Andrew's tree as a baseline, I suggest using the
> following git tree
>
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 08:32:54PM +, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> >> It is returning some confusing (to me) results. I'd like
> >> to get these resolved before posting any benchmark
> >> results.
> >>
> >> 1. When it has visited every array element, it returns the
> >> same value as was passed
> On Mar 22, 2021, at 3:49 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 06:25:03PM +, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 22, 2021, at 5:18 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
>>>
>>> This series is based on top of Matthew Wilcox's series "Rationalise
>>> __alloc_pages wrapper" and does
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 06:25:03PM +, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 22, 2021, at 5:18 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >
> > This series is based on top of Matthew Wilcox's series "Rationalise
> > __alloc_pages wrapper" and does not apply to 5.12-rc2. If you want to
> > test and are not
> On Mar 22, 2021, at 5:18 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> This series is based on top of Matthew Wilcox's series "Rationalise
> __alloc_pages wrapper" and does not apply to 5.12-rc2. If you want to
> test and are not using Andrew's tree as a baseline, I suggest using the
> following git tree
>
>
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 01:04:46PM +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 09:18:42 +
> Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > This series is based on top of Matthew Wilcox's series "Rationalise
> > __alloc_pages wrapper" and does not apply to 5.12-rc2. If you want to
> > test and are
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 09:18:42 +
Mel Gorman wrote:
> This series is based on top of Matthew Wilcox's series "Rationalise
> __alloc_pages wrapper" and does not apply to 5.12-rc2. If you want to
> test and are not using Andrew's tree as a baseline, I suggest using the
> following git tree
>
>
This series is based on top of Matthew Wilcox's series "Rationalise
__alloc_pages wrapper" and does not apply to 5.12-rc2. If you want to
test and are not using Andrew's tree as a baseline, I suggest using the
following git tree
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mel/linux.git
15 matches
Mail list logo
