Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq stats: Bug fixes

2014-01-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, September 26, 2013 03:59:50 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > I know you asked me not to send any more patches before the earlier ones get > into kernel. I got to this as Nicolas Pitre required to send few CPUFreq > patches > for ARM's big LITTLE In-Kernel-Switcher. And within

Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq stats: Bug fixes

2013-10-22 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 23 October 2013 02:36, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > My testing of those patches took a long and winding path but finally I > was able to do it today. > > So for the 4 patches: > > Tested-by: Nicolas Pitre > Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre Ahh.. Thanks Nico.. that would be pretty helpful :) -- To unsubscri

Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq stats: Bug fixes

2013-10-22 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013, Viresh Kumar wrote: > There are several problems/bugs in cpufreq-stats specially with cpufreq > drivers > as modules and suspend/resume path. These are mentioned well in changelogs. > > These are tested over my thinkpad (acpi-cpufreq) in following way: > [1] offline+online a

[PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq stats: Bug fixes

2013-09-26 Thread Viresh Kumar
Hi Rafael, I know you asked me not to send any more patches before the earlier ones get into kernel. I got to this as Nicolas Pitre required to send few CPUFreq patches for ARM's big LITTLE In-Kernel-Switcher. And within linaro we have hacked these bugs in a bad way.. Because of his dependency I