On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 09:32 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Richard Purdie wrote:
> > I think you were cc'd on some of it but you never commented. Anyhow,
> > I've reworked this patch series based on your comments. The hints were
> > appreciated, thanks. This was the way I'd originally hoped to be
Richard Purdie wrote:
No, not this way, I'm afraid. Sorry, I don't remember the prior
discussion on LKML, must have flooded past when my attention was
elsewhere.
I think you were cc'd on some of it but you never commented. Anyhow,
I've reworked this patch series based on your comments. The
Improve the error handling when writes fail to a swap page.
Currently, the kernel will repeatedly retry the write which is unlikely
to ever succeed. Instead we allow the pages to be unused and then marked
as bad at which prevents reuse. It should hopefully be suitable for
testing in -mm.
Hugh
Improve the error handling when writes fail to a swap page.
Currently, the kernel will repeatedly retry the write which is unlikely
to ever succeed. Instead we allow the pages to be unused and then marked
as bad at which prevents reuse. It should hopefully be suitable for
testing in -mm.
Hugh
Richard Purdie wrote:
No, not this way, I'm afraid. Sorry, I don't remember the prior
discussion on LKML, must have flooded past when my attention was
elsewhere.
I think you were cc'd on some of it but you never commented. Anyhow,
I've reworked this patch series based on your comments. The
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 09:32 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
Richard Purdie wrote:
I think you were cc'd on some of it but you never commented. Anyhow,
I've reworked this patch series based on your comments. The hints were
appreciated, thanks. This was the way I'd originally hoped to be able to
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Richard Purdie wrote:
> Improve the error handling when writes fail to a swap page.
>
> Currently, the kernel will repeatedly retry the write which is unlikely
> to ever succeed. Instead we allow the pages to be unused and then marked
> as bad at which prevents reuse. It
Improve the error handling when writes fail to a swap page.
Currently, the kernel will repeatedly retry the write which is unlikely
to ever succeed. Instead we allow the pages to be unused and then marked
as bad at which prevents reuse. It should hopefully be suitable for
testing in -mm.
These
Improve the error handling when writes fail to a swap page.
Currently, the kernel will repeatedly retry the write which is unlikely
to ever succeed. Instead we allow the pages to be unused and then marked
as bad at which prevents reuse. It should hopefully be suitable for
testing in -mm.
These
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Richard Purdie wrote:
Improve the error handling when writes fail to a swap page.
Currently, the kernel will repeatedly retry the write which is unlikely
to ever succeed. Instead we allow the pages to be unused and then marked
as bad at which prevents reuse. It should
10 matches
Mail list logo
