Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: SVM: Code move follow-up

2020-06-25 Thread Krish Sadhukhan
On 6/25/20 1:03 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote: From: Joerg Roedel Hi, here is small series to follow-up on the review comments for moving the kvm-amd module code to its own sub-directory. The comments were only about renaming structs and symbols, so there are no functional changes in these patches.

Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: SVM: Code move follow-up

2020-06-25 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 25/06/20 11:34, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Joerg Roedel writes: > >> From: Joerg Roedel >> >> Hi, >> >> here is small series to follow-up on the review comments for moving >> the kvm-amd module code to its own sub-directory. The comments were >> only about renaming structs and symbols, so ther

Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: SVM: Code move follow-up

2020-06-25 Thread Vitaly Kuznetsov
Joerg Roedel writes: > From: Joerg Roedel > > Hi, > > here is small series to follow-up on the review comments for moving > the kvm-amd module code to its own sub-directory. The comments were > only about renaming structs and symbols, so there are no functional > changes in these patches. > > Th

[PATCH 0/4] KVM: SVM: Code move follow-up

2020-06-25 Thread Joerg Roedel
From: Joerg Roedel Hi, here is small series to follow-up on the review comments for moving the kvm-amd module code to its own sub-directory. The comments were only about renaming structs and symbols, so there are no functional changes in these patches. The comments addressed here are all from [