On Friday 16 February 2018 06:35 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Kishon,
>
> Am Freitag, 16. Februar 2018, 12:04:42 CET schrieb Kishon Vijay Abraham I:
>> On Friday 10 February 2017 01:14 PM, Chris Zhong wrote:
>>> There are 2 Type-c PHYs in RK3399, but only one DP controller. Hence
>>> only one
On Friday 16 February 2018 06:35 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Kishon,
>
> Am Freitag, 16. Februar 2018, 12:04:42 CET schrieb Kishon Vijay Abraham I:
>> On Friday 10 February 2017 01:14 PM, Chris Zhong wrote:
>>> There are 2 Type-c PHYs in RK3399, but only one DP controller. Hence
>>> only one
Hi Kishon,
Am Freitag, 16. Februar 2018, 12:04:42 CET schrieb Kishon Vijay Abraham I:
> On Friday 10 February 2017 01:14 PM, Chris Zhong wrote:
> > There are 2 Type-c PHYs in RK3399, but only one DP controller. Hence
> > only one PHY can connect to DP controller at one time, the other should
> >
Hi Kishon,
Am Freitag, 16. Februar 2018, 12:04:42 CET schrieb Kishon Vijay Abraham I:
> On Friday 10 February 2017 01:14 PM, Chris Zhong wrote:
> > There are 2 Type-c PHYs in RK3399, but only one DP controller. Hence
> > only one PHY can connect to DP controller at one time, the other should
> >
Hi,
On Friday 10 February 2017 01:14 PM, Chris Zhong wrote:
>
> There are 2 Type-c PHYs in RK3399, but only one DP controller. Hence
> only one PHY can connect to DP controller at one time, the other should
> be disconnected. The GRF_SOC_CON26 register has a switch bit to do it,
> set this bit
Hi,
On Friday 10 February 2017 01:14 PM, Chris Zhong wrote:
>
> There are 2 Type-c PHYs in RK3399, but only one DP controller. Hence
> only one PHY can connect to DP controller at one time, the other should
> be disconnected. The GRF_SOC_CON26 register has a switch bit to do it,
> set this bit
Hi,
Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2017, 08:08:31 CET schrieb Doug Anderson:
> On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2017, 10:47:08 CET schrieb Chris Zhong:
> >> On 2017年12月02日 05:58, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> >> > Am Freitag, 1. Dezember 2017,
Hi,
Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2017, 08:08:31 CET schrieb Doug Anderson:
> On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2017, 10:47:08 CET schrieb Chris Zhong:
> >> On 2017年12月02日 05:58, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> >> > Am Freitag, 1. Dezember 2017, 13:42:46 CET
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2017, 10:47:08 CET schrieb Chris Zhong:
>> On 2017年12月02日 05:58, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>> > Am Freitag, 1. Dezember 2017, 13:42:46 CET schrieb Doug Anderson:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> On
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2017, 10:47:08 CET schrieb Chris Zhong:
>> On 2017年12月02日 05:58, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>> > Am Freitag, 1. Dezember 2017, 13:42:46 CET schrieb Doug Anderson:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Nov 29,
Hi Chris,
Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2017, 10:47:08 CET schrieb Chris Zhong:
> On 2017年12月02日 05:58, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 1. Dezember 2017, 13:42:46 CET schrieb Doug Anderson:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Chris Zhong wrote:
> >>> Hi Doug
Hi Chris,
Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2017, 10:47:08 CET schrieb Chris Zhong:
> On 2017年12月02日 05:58, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 1. Dezember 2017, 13:42:46 CET schrieb Doug Anderson:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Chris Zhong wrote:
> >>> Hi Doug
> >>>
> >>> Thank
Hi Heiko
On 2017??12??02?? 05:58, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
Am Freitag, 1. Dezember 2017, 13:42:46 CET schrieb Doug Anderson:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Chris Zhong wrote:
Hi Doug
Thank you for mentioning this patch.
I think the focus of the discussion is: can
Hi Heiko
On 2017??12??02?? 05:58, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
Am Freitag, 1. Dezember 2017, 13:42:46 CET schrieb Doug Anderson:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Chris Zhong wrote:
Hi Doug
Thank you for mentioning this patch.
I think the focus of the discussion is: can we put the grf
Am Freitag, 1. Dezember 2017, 13:42:46 CET schrieb Doug Anderson:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Chris Zhong wrote:
> > Hi Doug
> >
> > Thank you for mentioning this patch.
> >
> > I think the focus of the discussion is: can we put the grf control bit to
> > dts.
Am Freitag, 1. Dezember 2017, 13:42:46 CET schrieb Doug Anderson:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Chris Zhong wrote:
> > Hi Doug
> >
> > Thank you for mentioning this patch.
> >
> > I think the focus of the discussion is: can we put the grf control bit to
> > dts.
> >
> > The RK3399
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Chris Zhong wrote:
> Hi Doug
>
> Thank you for mentioning this patch.
>
> I think the focus of the discussion is: can we put the grf control bit to
> dts.
>
> The RK3399 has 2 Type-C phy, but only one DP controller, this "uphy_dp_sel"
>
>
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Chris Zhong wrote:
> Hi Doug
>
> Thank you for mentioning this patch.
>
> I think the focus of the discussion is: can we put the grf control bit to
> dts.
>
> The RK3399 has 2 Type-C phy, but only one DP controller, this "uphy_dp_sel"
>
> can help to switch
Hi Doug
Thank you for mentioning this patch.
I think the focus of the discussion is: can we put the grf control bit
to dts.
The RK3399 has 2 Type-C phy, but only one DP controller, this "uphy_dp_sel"
can help to switch these 2 phy. So I think this bit can be considered as
a part of
Hi Doug
Thank you for mentioning this patch.
I think the focus of the discussion is: can we put the grf control bit
to dts.
The RK3399 has 2 Type-C phy, but only one DP controller, this "uphy_dp_sel"
can help to switch these 2 phy. So I think this bit can be considered as
a part of
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Chris Zhong wrote:
>
> There are 2 Type-c PHYs in RK3399, but only one DP controller. Hence
> only one PHY can connect to DP controller at one time, the other should
> be disconnected. The GRF_SOC_CON26 register has a switch bit to do it,
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Chris Zhong wrote:
>
> There are 2 Type-c PHYs in RK3399, but only one DP controller. Hence
> only one PHY can connect to DP controller at one time, the other should
> be disconnected. The GRF_SOC_CON26 register has a switch bit to do it,
> set this bit means
There are 2 Type-c PHYs in RK3399, but only one DP controller. Hence
only one PHY can connect to DP controller at one time, the other should
be disconnected. The GRF_SOC_CON26 register has a switch bit to do it,
set this bit means enable PHY 1, clear this bit means enable PHY 0.
If the board has
There are 2 Type-c PHYs in RK3399, but only one DP controller. Hence
only one PHY can connect to DP controller at one time, the other should
be disconnected. The GRF_SOC_CON26 register has a switch bit to do it,
set this bit means enable PHY 1, clear this bit means enable PHY 0.
If the board has
24 matches
Mail list logo