On Sun 07-12-14 20:00:26, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sun 07-12-14 08:55:51, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 11:09:53AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > this is another attempt to address OOM vs. PM interaction. More
> > > about the issue is described in the last patch. The other 4 patche
On Sun 07-12-14 08:55:51, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 11:09:53AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > this is another attempt to address OOM vs. PM interaction. More
> > about the issue is described in the last patch. The other 4 patches
> > are just clean ups. This is based on top of 3.18
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 11:09:53AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> this is another attempt to address OOM vs. PM interaction. More
> about the issue is described in the last patch. The other 4 patches
> are just clean ups. This is based on top of 3.18-rc3 + Johannes'
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel
For some reason this is the previous version of the cover letter. I had
some issues with git send-email which was failing for me. Anyway, this
is the correct cover. Sorry about the cofusion.
Hi,
this is another attempt to address OOM vs. PM interaction. More
about the issue is described in the las
Hi,
here is another take at OOM vs. PM freezer interaction fixes/cleanups.
First three patches are fixes for an unlikely cases when OOM races with
the PM freezer which should be closed completely finally. The last patch
is a simple code enhancement which is not needed strictly speaking but
it is ni
5 matches
Mail list logo
