On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 10:12 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> This series goal was primarily to separate dependincies and make it
> clearer what DEBUG_PAGEALLOC and what SET_DIRECT_MAP are. As it
> turned
> out, there is also some lack of consistency between architectures
> that
> implement either of t
On 25.10.20 11:15, Mike Rapoport wrote:
From: Mike Rapoport
Hi,
During recent discussion about KVM protected memory, David raised a concern
about usage of __kernel_map_pages() outside of DEBUG_PAGEALLOC scope [1].
Indeed, for architectures that define CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_DIRECT_MAP it is
poss
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 09:03:31PM +, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 11:20:12AM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:38:16AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is a theoretical bug, but i
On Wed, 2020-10-28 at 13:09 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 09:46:35AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 27.10.20 09:38, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 06:05:30PM +, Edgecombe, Rick P
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Beyond whatever you are seeing, for
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:38:16AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 06:05:30PM +, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 11:05 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:13:52AM +, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2020-10-25 at 12:1
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:17:35PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 28.10.20 12:09, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 09:46:35AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 27.10.20 09:38, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 06:05:30PM +, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 11:20:12AM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:38:16AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 06:05:30PM +, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 11:05 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:13:52
On 28.10.20 12:09, Mike Rapoport wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 09:46:35AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 27.10.20 09:38, Mike Rapoport wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 06:05:30PM +, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
Beyond whatever you are seeing, for the latter case of new things
getting intro
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 09:46:35AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 27.10.20 09:38, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 06:05:30PM +, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> >
> > > Beyond whatever you are seeing, for the latter case of new things
> > > getting introduced to an interface w
On Wed, 2020-10-28 at 13:30 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 11:20:12AM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:38:16AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 06:05:30PM +, Edgecombe, Rick P
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 11:0
On 27.10.20 10:47, Mike Rapoport wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 09:46:35AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 27.10.20 09:38, Mike Rapoport wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 06:05:30PM +, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 11:05 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 09:46:35AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 27.10.20 09:38, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 06:05:30PM +, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 11:05 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:13:52AM +, Edgecom
On 27.10.20 09:38, Mike Rapoport wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 06:05:30PM +, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 11:05 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:13:52AM +, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
On Sun, 2020-10-25 at 12:15 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
Indeed,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 06:05:30PM +, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 11:05 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:13:52AM +, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2020-10-25 at 12:15 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > > Indeed, for architectures that de
On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 11:05 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:13:52AM +, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-10-25 at 12:15 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > Indeed, for architectures that define
> > > CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_DIRECT_MAP
> > > it is
> > > possible that _
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:13:52AM +, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-10-25 at 12:15 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Indeed, for architectures that define CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_DIRECT_MAP
> > it is
> > possible that __kernel_map_pages() would fail, but since this
> > function is
> > void,
On Sun, 2020-10-25 at 12:15 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Indeed, for architectures that define CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_DIRECT_MAP
> it is
> possible that __kernel_map_pages() would fail, but since this
> function is
> void, the failure will go unnoticed.
Could you elaborate on how this could happen?
From: Mike Rapoport
Hi,
During recent discussion about KVM protected memory, David raised a concern
about usage of __kernel_map_pages() outside of DEBUG_PAGEALLOC scope [1].
Indeed, for architectures that define CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_DIRECT_MAP it is
possible that __kernel_map_pages() would fail,
18 matches
Mail list logo