Re: [PATCH 0/4] cpusets mems_allowed constrain GFP_KERNEL, oom killer

Andrew, Yesterday, I wrote: > Please throw away the following 4 patches in 2.6.13-mm1: > > cpusets-oom_kill-tweaks.patch > cpusets-new-__gfp_hardwall-flag.patch > cpusets-formalize-intermediate-gfp_kernel-containment.patch > cpusets-confine-oom_killer-to-mem_exclusive-cpuset.patch Looks

Re: [PATCH 0/4] cpusets mems_allowed constrain GFP_KERNEL, oom killer

Andrew, Please throw away the following 4 patches in 2.6.13-mm1: cpusets-oom_kill-tweaks.patch cpusets-new-__gfp_hardwall-flag.patch cpusets-formalize-intermediate-gfp_kernel-containment.patch cpusets-confine-oom_killer-to-mem_exclusive-cpuset.patch You will see almost the same patches c

[PATCH 0/4] cpusets mems_allowed constrain GFP_KERNEL, oom killer

The following patch is proposed for inclusion in 2.6.14. This patch extends the use of the cpuset attribute 'mem_exclusive' to support cpuset configurations that: 1) allow GFP_KERNEL allocations to come from a potentially larger set of memory nodes than GFP_USER allocations, and 2) can const