> So, why is ide-scsi still in the tree? Is there some use case besides
> cdrecord? (Which can use /dev/hda already without the ide-scsi blob...)
With old IDE only ide-scsi can handle some of the more obscurely weird
devices, and some tape drives fail with ide-tape but work with ide-scsi
+
On Feb 12 2008 01:09, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
>> On a different note, i noticed ide-scsi might also need a cleanup
>> similar to the other drivers. It is next on my TODO list in case
>> you don't have anything with a higher prio.
>
>I was actually hoping that you'll continue unifying
On Feb 12 2008 01:09, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On a different note, i noticed ide-scsi might also need a cleanup
similar to the other drivers. It is next on my TODO list in case
you don't have anything with a higher prio.
I was actually hoping that you'll continue unifying ATAPI
So, why is ide-scsi still in the tree? Is there some use case besides
cdrecord? (Which can use /dev/hda already without the ide-scsi blob...)
With old IDE only ide-scsi can handle some of the more obscurely weird
devices, and some tape drives fail with ide-tape but work with ide-scsi
+
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:09:24AM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> On Monday 11 February 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Hi Bart,
> >
> > here's the ide_atapi_pc unification series. It all went pretty smoothly
> > along
> > the search & replace line. Using driver-specific members
On Monday 11 February 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Hi Bart,
>
> here's the ide_atapi_pc unification series. It all went pretty smoothly along
> the search & replace line. Using driver-specific members in ide_atapi_pc like
> idefloppy_callback and idetape_callback is kinda dumb but this
Hi Bart,
here's the ide_atapi_pc unification series. It all went pretty smoothly along
the search & replace line. Using driver-specific members in ide_atapi_pc like
idefloppy_callback and idetape_callback is kinda dumb but this approach seemed
the fastest versus unnecessary callback function
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:09:24AM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Monday 11 February 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Hi Bart,
here's the ide_atapi_pc unification series. It all went pretty smoothly
along
the search replace line. Using driver-specific members in
On Monday 11 February 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Hi Bart,
here's the ide_atapi_pc unification series. It all went pretty smoothly along
the search replace line. Using driver-specific members in ide_atapi_pc like
idefloppy_callback and idetape_callback is kinda dumb but this approach
9 matches
Mail list logo
