Re: [PATCH 0/4] improvements to the nmi_backtrace code

2016-03-01 Thread Petr Mladek
On Mon 2016-02-29 16:49:56, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 16:40:20 -0500 Chris Metcalf wrote: > > > This patch series modifies the trigger_xxx_backtrace() NMI-based > > remote backtracing code to make it more flexible, and makes a few > > small improvements along the way. > > > > Th

Re: [PATCH 0/4] improvements to the nmi_backtrace code

2016-02-29 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 16:40:20 -0500 Chris Metcalf wrote: > This patch series modifies the trigger_xxx_backtrace() NMI-based > remote backtracing code to make it more flexible, and makes a few > small improvements along the way. > > The motivation comes from the task isolation code, where there ar

[PATCH 0/4] improvements to the nmi_backtrace code

2016-02-29 Thread Chris Metcalf
This patch series modifies the trigger_xxx_backtrace() NMI-based remote backtracing code to make it more flexible, and makes a few small improvements along the way. The motivation comes from the task isolation code, where there are scenarios where we want to be able to diagnose a case where some c