*sigh* it seems that the email this morning wasn't sent, resending...
On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 17:57 +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Hi Davidlohr,
>
> On 05/26/2013 10:50 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> >
> > In lack of getting my swingbench DSS environment back, I ran these
> > changes against the semo
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 01:50:38PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 05/26/2013 10:04 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 11:08:51AM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> >>I've split my patch into 4 parts:
> >>- 1: Fix-missing-wakeups-in-do_smart_update
> >>- 2: seperate-wait-for-zero-and-alter-t
On 05/26/2013 10:04 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 11:08:51AM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
I've split my patch into 4 parts:
- 1: Fix-missing-wakeups-in-do_smart_update
- 2: seperate-wait-for-zero-and-alter-tasks
- 3: Always-use-only-one-queue-for-alter-operations
- 4: Rename-try_ato
Hi Davidlohr,
On 05/26/2013 10:50 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
In lack of getting my swingbench DSS environment back, I ran these
changes against the semop-multi program on my laptop. For 256 threads,
with Manfred's patchset the ops/sec suffers around -7.3%.
Could you also check the performance
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 11:08:51AM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> I've split my patch into 4 parts:
> - 1: Fix-missing-wakeups-in-do_smart_update
> - 2: seperate-wait-for-zero-and-alter-tasks
> - 3: Always-use-only-one-queue-for-alter-operations
> - 4: Rename-try_atomic_semop-to-perform_atomic
>
>
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>
> In lack of getting my swingbench DSS environment back, I ran these
> changes against the semop-multi program on my laptop. For 256 threads,
> with Manfred's patchset the ops/sec suffers around -7.3%.
Hmm. That test program only tests sim
On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 11:08 +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> I've split my patch into 4 parts:
> - 1: Fix-missing-wakeups-in-do_smart_update
> - 2: seperate-wait-for-zero-and-alter-tasks
> - 3: Always-use-only-one-queue-for-alter-operations
> - 4: Rename-try_atomic_semop-to-perform_atomic
>
> Linus:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Manfred Spraul
wrote:
> I've split my patch into 4 parts:
> - 1: Fix-missing-wakeups-in-do_smart_update
> - 2: seperate-wait-for-zero-and-alter-tasks
> - 3: Always-use-only-one-queue-for-alter-operations
> - 4: Rename-try_atomic_semop-to-perform_atomic
Rik, Davidl
I've split my patch into 4 parts:
- 1: Fix-missing-wakeups-in-do_smart_update
- 2: seperate-wait-for-zero-and-alter-tasks
- 3: Always-use-only-one-queue-for-alter-operations
- 4: Rename-try_atomic_semop-to-perform_atomic
Linus:
- Patch 1 should be merged immediately: It fixes bugs,
the current c
9 matches
Mail list logo
