On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 07:38:28PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:05:54PM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> > > slab_list and lru are in the same bits. Once this patch set is in,
> > > we can remove the enigmatic 'uses lru' comment that I added.
> >
> > Funny you should
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 01:01:53PM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:22:23AM +, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 04:16:33PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 08:49:23PM +, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > > > The patchset looks go
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 07:38:28PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:05:54PM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> > > slab_list and lru are in the same bits. Once this patch set is in,
> > > we can remove the enigmatic 'uses lru' comment that I added.
> >
> > Funny you should
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:05:54PM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> > slab_list and lru are in the same bits. Once this patch set is in,
> > we can remove the enigmatic 'uses lru' comment that I added.
>
> Funny you should say this, I came to me today while daydreaming that I
> should have remove
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:22:23AM +, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 04:16:33PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 08:49:23PM +, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > > The patchset looks good to me, however I'd add some clarifications
> > > why switching from lru
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:22:23AM +, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 04:16:33PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 08:49:23PM +, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > > The patchset looks good to me, however I'd add some clarifications
> > > why switching from lru
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 04:16:33PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 08:49:23PM +, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > The patchset looks good to me, however I'd add some clarifications
> > why switching from lru to slab_list is safe.
> >
> > My understanding is that the slab_list f
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 04:16:33PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 08:49:23PM +, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > The patchset looks good to me, however I'd add some clarifications
> > why switching from lru to slab_list is safe.
> >
> > My understanding is that the slab_list f
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 08:49:23PM +, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> The patchset looks good to me, however I'd add some clarifications
> why switching from lru to slab_list is safe.
>
> My understanding is that the slab_list fields isn't currently in use,
> but it's not that obvious that putting sla
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 12:07:40PM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> Currently the slab allocators (ab)use the struct page 'lru' list_head.
> We have a list head for slab allocators to use, 'slab_list'.
>
> Clean up all three allocators by using the 'slab_list' list_head instead
> of overloading th
Currently the slab allocators (ab)use the struct page 'lru' list_head.
We have a list head for slab allocators to use, 'slab_list'.
Clean up all three allocators by using the 'slab_list' list_head instead
of overloading the 'lru' list_head.
Initial patch makes no code changes, adds comments to #e
11 matches
Mail list logo
