Re: [PATCH 0/4] of: remove *phandle properties from expanded device tree

2017-04-19 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: > Hi Rob, > > Please do not apply this patch series. What about patches 2-4? Those seem unrelated. But #2 didn't apply for me, so resend if I should apply. Rob > > The more context I look at, the less this approach seems good. > > I hope to h

Re: [PATCH 0/4] of: remove *phandle properties from expanded device tree

2017-04-18 Thread Frank Rowand
Hi Rob, Please do not apply this patch series. The more context I look at, the less this approach seems good. I hope to have a simpler version completed quickly. Thanks, - Frank On 04/14/17 20:58, Frank Rowand wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > I left you off the distribution list, sorry... > > On 0

Re: [PATCH 0/4] of: remove *phandle properties from expanded device tree

2017-04-14 Thread Frank Rowand
Hi Stephen, I left you off the distribution list, sorry... On 04/14/17 20:55, frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Frank Rowand > > Remove "phandle" and "linux,phandle" properties from the internal > device tree. The phandle will still be in the struct device_node > phandle field. > > This i

[PATCH 0/4] of: remove *phandle properties from expanded device tree

2017-04-14 Thread frowand . list
From: Frank Rowand Remove "phandle" and "linux,phandle" properties from the internal device tree. The phandle will still be in the struct device_node phandle field. This is to resolve the issue found by Stephen Boyd [1] when he changed the type of struct property.value from void * to const void