On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Please do not apply this patch series.
What about patches 2-4? Those seem unrelated. But #2 didn't apply for
me, so resend if I should apply.
Rob
>
> The more context I look at, the less this approach seems good.
>
> I hope to h
Hi Rob,
Please do not apply this patch series.
The more context I look at, the less this approach seems good.
I hope to have a simpler version completed quickly.
Thanks,
- Frank
On 04/14/17 20:58, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> I left you off the distribution list, sorry...
>
> On 0
Hi Stephen,
I left you off the distribution list, sorry...
On 04/14/17 20:55, frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Frank Rowand
>
> Remove "phandle" and "linux,phandle" properties from the internal
> device tree. The phandle will still be in the struct device_node
> phandle field.
>
> This i
From: Frank Rowand
Remove "phandle" and "linux,phandle" properties from the internal
device tree. The phandle will still be in the struct device_node
phandle field.
This is to resolve the issue found by Stephen Boyd [1] when he changed
the type of struct property.value from void * to const void
4 matches
Mail list logo