On Sunday 12 August 2007 4:47:17 pm Stefan Richter wrote:
> Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Sunday 12 August 2007 3:17:38 pm Stefan Richter wrote:
> >> - it's a little bit faster to create these headers than to add them
> >> to 00-INDEX: Just move the existing title to the top.
>
> ...
>
> > What
Rob Landley wrote:
> On Sunday 12 August 2007 3:17:38 pm Stefan Richter wrote:
>> - it's a little bit faster to create these headers than to add them
>> to 00-INDEX: Just move the existing title to the top.
...
> What variant of "fast" do you mean? Processing the entire directory takes a
On Sunday 12 August 2007 3:17:38 pm Stefan Richter wrote:
> > This heuristic seems to need about as much cleanup as just fixing
> > 00-INDEX.txt in all the directories.
>
> I didn't think of heuristics but rather of a style guideline. Maybe
> prepend this metadata line with "Subject: " or so to
On Sunday 12 August 2007 3:11:06 pm Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 12/08/07, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday 12 August 2007 7:48:37 am Stefan Richter wrote:
> > > Isn't it with 00-INDEX just like with the "Last Updated:" footers in
> > > documentation texts?
> > >
> > > They are
On Sunday 12 August 2007 12:10:56 pm Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > Isn't it with 00-INDEX just like with the "Last Updated:" footers in
> > documentation texts?
>
> That is certainly a risk, yes. But it shouldn't be hard to write a
> small script to check if the 00-INDEX files are up-to-date, that will
>
On Saturday 11 August 2007 5:45:02 pm Jesper Juhl wrote:
> So please do the ACK/NACK/Merge dance with these patches and
> let me know if more are wanted or not. :-)
Acked-by: Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Just tried 'em: they worked for me. :)
Thanks,
Rob
--
"One of my most productive days
Rob Landley wrote:
> On Sunday 12 August 2007 12:34:30 pm Stefan Richter wrote:
>> Or use the first line of each text file to describe what the file is about.
...
> This heuristic seems to need about as much cleanup as just fixing
> 00-INDEX.txt
> in all the directories.
I didn't think of
On 12/08/07, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 12 August 2007 7:48:37 am Stefan Richter wrote:
> > Isn't it with 00-INDEX just like with the "Last Updated:" footers in
> > documentation texts?
> >
> > They are metadata which will be almost always out of date.
>
> If nothing is
On Sunday 12 August 2007 7:48:37 am Stefan Richter wrote:
> Isn't it with 00-INDEX just like with the "Last Updated:" footers in
> documentation texts?
>
> They are metadata which will be almost always out of date.
If nothing is using them, they'll bit-rot, yes. Way of the world. But I've
On Sunday 12 August 2007 12:34:30 pm Stefan Richter wrote:
> Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > On 12/08/07, Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Isn't it with 00-INDEX just like with the "Last Updated:" footers in
> >> documentation texts?
> >
> > That is certainly a risk, yes. But it shouldn't be
Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 12/08/07, Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Isn't it with 00-INDEX just like with the "Last Updated:" footers in
>> documentation texts?
>>
> That is certainly a risk, yes. But it shouldn't be hard to write a
> small script to check if the 00-INDEX files are
On 12/08/07, Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > Rob Landley is trying to organize Linux kernel documentation. One
> > thing he is doing is generating index.html files based on our
> > 00-INDEX files in the Documentation directory. He has met with a
> > small problem
Jesper Juhl wrote:
> Rob Landley is trying to organize Linux kernel documentation. One
> thing he is doing is generating index.html files based on our
> 00-INDEX files in the Documentation directory. He has met with a
> small problem however, since not all subdirectories inside
> Documentation
On Sunday 12 August 2007 4:47:17 pm Stefan Richter wrote:
Rob Landley wrote:
On Sunday 12 August 2007 3:17:38 pm Stefan Richter wrote:
- it's a little bit faster to create these headers than to add them
to 00-INDEX: Just move the existing title to the top.
...
What variant of
Jesper Juhl wrote:
Rob Landley is trying to organize Linux kernel documentation. One
thing he is doing is generating index.html files based on our
00-INDEX files in the Documentation directory. He has met with a
small problem however, since not all subdirectories inside
Documentation
On 12/08/07, Stefan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jesper Juhl wrote:
Rob Landley is trying to organize Linux kernel documentation. One
thing he is doing is generating index.html files based on our
00-INDEX files in the Documentation directory. He has met with a
small problem however,
Jesper Juhl wrote:
On 12/08/07, Stefan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't it with 00-INDEX just like with the Last Updated: footers in
documentation texts?
That is certainly a risk, yes. But it shouldn't be hard to write a
small script to check if the 00-INDEX files are up-to-date, that
On Sunday 12 August 2007 12:34:30 pm Stefan Richter wrote:
Jesper Juhl wrote:
On 12/08/07, Stefan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't it with 00-INDEX just like with the Last Updated: footers in
documentation texts?
That is certainly a risk, yes. But it shouldn't be hard to write a
On Sunday 12 August 2007 7:48:37 am Stefan Richter wrote:
Isn't it with 00-INDEX just like with the Last Updated: footers in
documentation texts?
They are metadata which will be almost always out of date.
If nothing is using them, they'll bit-rot, yes. Way of the world. But I've
found a
On 12/08/07, Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 12 August 2007 7:48:37 am Stefan Richter wrote:
Isn't it with 00-INDEX just like with the Last Updated: footers in
documentation texts?
They are metadata which will be almost always out of date.
If nothing is using them,
Rob Landley wrote:
On Sunday 12 August 2007 12:34:30 pm Stefan Richter wrote:
Or use the first line of each text file to describe what the file is about.
...
This heuristic seems to need about as much cleanup as just fixing
00-INDEX.txt
in all the directories.
I didn't think of heuristics
On Sunday 12 August 2007 12:10:56 pm Jesper Juhl wrote:
Isn't it with 00-INDEX just like with the Last Updated: footers in
documentation texts?
That is certainly a risk, yes. But it shouldn't be hard to write a
small script to check if the 00-INDEX files are up-to-date, that will
make it
On Saturday 11 August 2007 5:45:02 pm Jesper Juhl wrote:
So please do the ACK/NACK/Merge dance with these patches and
let me know if more are wanted or not. :-)
Acked-by: Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just tried 'em: they worked for me. :)
Thanks,
Rob
--
One of my most productive days was
On Sunday 12 August 2007 3:11:06 pm Jesper Juhl wrote:
On 12/08/07, Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 12 August 2007 7:48:37 am Stefan Richter wrote:
Isn't it with 00-INDEX just like with the Last Updated: footers in
documentation texts?
They are metadata which will be
On Sunday 12 August 2007 3:17:38 pm Stefan Richter wrote:
This heuristic seems to need about as much cleanup as just fixing
00-INDEX.txt in all the directories.
I didn't think of heuristics but rather of a style guideline. Maybe
prepend this metadata line with Subject: or so to
Rob Landley wrote:
On Sunday 12 August 2007 3:17:38 pm Stefan Richter wrote:
- it's a little bit faster to create these headers than to add them
to 00-INDEX: Just move the existing title to the top.
...
What variant of fast do you mean? Processing the entire directory takes a
Hi,
Rob Landley is trying to organize Linux kernel documentation. One
thing he is doing is generating index.html files based on our
00-INDEX files in the Documentation directory. He has met with a
small problem however, since not all subdirectories inside
Documentation contain such a file,
Hi,
Rob Landley is trying to organize Linux kernel documentation. One
thing he is doing is generating index.html files based on our
00-INDEX files in the Documentation directory. He has met with a
small problem however, since not all subdirectories inside
Documentation contain such a file,
28 matches
Mail list logo
