Re: [PATCH 0/5] Handle oom bypass more gracefully

2016-05-27 Thread Michal Hocko
JFYI, I plan to repost the series early next week after I review all the pieces again properly with a clean head. If some parts are not sound or completely unacceptable in principle then let me know of course. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Handle oom bypass more gracefully

2016-05-27 Thread Michal Hocko
JFYI, I plan to repost the series early next week after I review all the pieces again properly with a clean head. If some parts are not sound or completely unacceptable in principle then let me know of course. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs

[PATCH 0/5] Handle oom bypass more gracefully

2016-05-26 Thread Michal Hocko
Hi, the following 6 patches should put some order to very rare cases of mm shared between processes and make the paths which bypass the oom killer oom reapable and so much more reliable finally. Even though mm shared outside of threadgroup is rare (either use_mm by kernel threads or exotic

[PATCH 0/5] Handle oom bypass more gracefully

2016-05-26 Thread Michal Hocko
Hi, the following 6 patches should put some order to very rare cases of mm shared between processes and make the paths which bypass the oom killer oom reapable and so much more reliable finally. Even though mm shared outside of threadgroup is rare (either use_mm by kernel threads or exotic