Re: [PATCH 0/5] Optional regulator support

2013-07-30 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 01:40:28PM +0100, Chris Ball wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30 2013, Mark Brown wrote: > > Right now all the MMC users are converted over as-is, though it does > > look like drivers such as sdhci really ought to be insisting on having a > > regulator for VMMC in the same way that the

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Optional regulator support

2013-07-30 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, On Tue, Jul 30 2013, Mark Brown wrote: > This patch series adds a variant of regulator_get() which allows > regulator consumers to tell the core that the supply they are requesting > may genuinely be absent in the system. The goal is to help address some > of the problems with handling errors

[PATCH 0/5] Optional regulator support

2013-07-30 Thread Mark Brown
This patch series adds a variant of regulator_get() which allows regulator consumers to tell the core that the supply they are requesting may genuinely be absent in the system. The goal is to help address some of the problems with handling errors in regulator_get() in drivers that are newly conver