Re: [PATCH 0/5] RCU-walk support for autofs

2014-08-20 Thread Ian Kent
On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 11:42 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > Great minds think alike. > I have basically the exact same patch and I'm testing now. > It probably should be folded into "autofs4: avoid taking fs_lock during > rcu-walk". > > It takes ages though, the test has two configurations to test and ea

Re: [PATCH 0/5] RCU-walk support for autofs

2014-08-19 Thread Ian Kent
On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 11:42 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > From 201f75bc25906e8f64e28b37f1bb478958bf2987 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: NeilBrown > > Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 12:40:06 +1000 > > Subject: [PATCH] autofs4: make "autofs4_can_expire" idempotent. > > > > Have a "test" function chang

Re: [PATCH 0/5] RCU-walk support for autofs

2014-08-19 Thread Ian Kent
On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 13:13 +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 20:36:55 +0800 Ian Kent wrote: > > > On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 21:16 +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:02:27 +0800 Ian Kent wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 16:25 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 0/5] RCU-walk support for autofs

2014-08-19 Thread NeilBrown
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 20:36:55 +0800 Ian Kent wrote: > On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 21:16 +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:02:27 +0800 Ian Kent wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 16:25 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 16:33 +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > > > > > Hi I

Re: [PATCH 0/5] RCU-walk support for autofs

2014-08-19 Thread Ian Kent
On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 21:16 +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:02:27 +0800 Ian Kent wrote: > > > On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 16:25 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 16:33 +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > > > > Hi Ian, > > > > Have you had a chance to run your tests in these pat

Re: [PATCH 0/5] RCU-walk support for autofs

2014-08-19 Thread Ian Kent
On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 21:16 +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:02:27 +0800 Ian Kent wrote: > > > On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 16:25 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 16:33 +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > > > > Hi Ian, > > > > Have you had a chance to run your tests in these pat

Re: [PATCH 0/5] RCU-walk support for autofs

2014-08-19 Thread NeilBrown
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:02:27 +0800 Ian Kent wrote: > On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 16:25 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 16:33 +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > > > Hi Ian, > > > Have you had a chance to run your tests in these patches yet? > > > I've done what testing I can think of and canno

Re: [PATCH 0/5] RCU-walk support for autofs

2014-08-19 Thread Ian Kent
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 16:25 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 16:33 +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > > Hi Ian, > > Have you had a chance to run your tests in these patches yet? > > I've done what testing I can think of and cannot fault them. > > I haven't, I've been plagued with illness so

Re: [PATCH 0/5] RCU-walk support for autofs

2014-08-18 Thread Ian Kent
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 16:33 +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > Hi Ian, > Have you had a chance to run your tests in these patches yet? > I've done what testing I can think of and cannot fault them. I haven't, I've been plagued with illness so I'm not getting nearly enough done. I'll try to put a kernel t

[PATCH 0/5] RCU-walk support for autofs

2014-08-17 Thread NeilBrown
Hi Ian, Have you had a chance to run your tests in these patches yet? I've done what testing I can think of and cannot fault them. This set is against 3.17-rc1 and make use of the new -EISDIR handling for d_manage() and assumes the other patches which already went in through Andrew Morton.