Re: [PATCH 0/5] RFC: Public key encryption of dmesg by the kernel

2018-01-18 Thread Pavel Machek
On Sat 2017-12-30 19:57:59, Dan Aloni wrote: > From: Dan Aloni > > Hi All, > > There has been a lot of progress in recent times regarding the removal > of sensitive information from dmesg (pointers, etc.), so I figured - why > not encrypt it all? However, I have not found any existing discussion

Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 0/5] RFC: Public key encryption of dmesg by the kernel

2018-01-03 Thread Dan Aloni
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 10:42:49PM +0100, Jann Horn wrote: > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Dan Aloni wrote: > > From: Dan Aloni > > > > Hi All, > > > > There has been a lot of progress in recent times regarding the removal > > of sensitive information from dmesg (pointers, etc.), so I figured

Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 0/5] RFC: Public key encryption of dmesg by the kernel

2017-12-30 Thread Jann Horn
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Dan Aloni wrote: > From: Dan Aloni > > Hi All, > > There has been a lot of progress in recent times regarding the removal > of sensitive information from dmesg (pointers, etc.), so I figured - why > not encrypt it all? However, I have not found any existing discus

[PATCH 0/5] RFC: Public key encryption of dmesg by the kernel

2017-12-30 Thread Dan Aloni
From: Dan Aloni Hi All, There has been a lot of progress in recent times regarding the removal of sensitive information from dmesg (pointers, etc.), so I figured - why not encrypt it all? However, I have not found any existing discussions or references regarding this technical direction. I am n