Re: [PATCH 0/5] TASK_KILLABLE

2007-10-24 Thread Nick Piggin
On Friday 19 October 2007 08:25, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > This series of patches introduces the facility to deliver only fatal > signals to tasks which are otherwise waiting uninterruptibly. This is pretty nice I think. It also is a significant piece of infrastructure required to fix some of the

Re: [PATCH 0/5] TASK_KILLABLE

2007-10-24 Thread Nick Piggin
On Friday 19 October 2007 08:25, Matthew Wilcox wrote: This series of patches introduces the facility to deliver only fatal signals to tasks which are otherwise waiting uninterruptibly. This is pretty nice I think. It also is a significant piece of infrastructure required to fix some of the

[PATCH 0/5] TASK_KILLABLE

2007-10-18 Thread Matthew Wilcox
This series of patches introduces the facility to deliver only fatal signals to tasks which are otherwise waiting uninterruptibly. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

[PATCH 0/5] TASK_KILLABLE

2007-10-18 Thread Matthew Wilcox
This series of patches introduces the facility to deliver only fatal signals to tasks which are otherwise waiting uninterruptibly. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at