On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 07:24:41 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 20 August 2013 19:33, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > OK, queued up for 3.12. Hopefully, there won't be any fallout from [3/5].
Argh, I meant [4/5], typed a wrong number. Whatever.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un
On 20 August 2013 19:33, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> OK, queued up for 3.12. Hopefully, there won't be any fallout from [3/5].
Hopefully :)
Thanks..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo inf
On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 06:07:14 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 20 August 2013 18:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Well, this looks good, but do we really need it in 3.12? It doesn't look
> > like 3.12 will be missing these changes a lot?
>
> Hmm.. If its too late for 3.12 we can skip them, but
On 20 August 2013 18:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Well, this looks good, but do we really need it in 3.12? It doesn't look
> like 3.12 will be missing these changes a lot?
Hmm.. If its too late for 3.12 we can skip them, but first two are bug
fixes really (though nobody is affected as cpufreq_
On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 12:08:21 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> You recently did this:
>
> commit 878f6e074e9a7784a6e351512eace4ccb3542eef
> Author: Rafael J. Wysocki
> Date: Sun Aug 18 15:35:59 2013 +0200
>
> Revert "cpufreq: Use cpufreq_policy_list for iterating over polici
Hi Rafael,
You recently did this:
commit 878f6e074e9a7784a6e351512eace4ccb3542eef
Author: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Sun Aug 18 15:35:59 2013 +0200
Revert "cpufreq: Use cpufreq_policy_list for iterating over policies"
Revert commit eb60852 (cpufreq: Use cpufreq_policy_list for itera
6 matches
Mail list logo
