On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:39:48PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 06:13:30PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 13:53 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:13:59AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > Jason, any ACK on these, or any of
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 06:13:30PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 13:53 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:13:59AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > Jason, any ACK on these, or any of the other random dynamic debug
> > > patches floating around? What a
On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 13:53 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:13:59AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Jason, any ACK on these, or any of the other random dynamic debug
> > patches floating around? What am I supposed to be applying here?
[]
> I just posted some follow up c
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 06:55:50PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 11:35 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> > If nobody else thinks this patch is better, let's at least add a comment in
> > __dev_printk() and __netdev_printk() to fix dynamic debug, if these are
> > changed.
>
> Or mayb
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 11:35 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> If nobody else thinks this patch is better, let's at least add a comment in
> __dev_printk() and __netdev_printk() to fix dynamic debug, if these are
> changed.
Or maybe make dynamic_emit_prefix a public function
and move the __dynamic__prin
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 08:12:01AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 10:52 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:43:46AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 13:51 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 04:25:25AM -0700, Joe Per
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 10:52 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:43:46AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 13:51 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 04:25:25AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > The recent commit to fix dynamic_debug was a bit
On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 11:43 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 13:51 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 04:25:25AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > The recent commit to fix dynamic_debug was a bit unclean.
> > > Neaten the style for dynamic_debug.
> > > Reduce the s
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:43:46AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 13:51 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 04:25:25AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > The recent commit to fix dynamic_debug was a bit unclean.
> > > Neaten the style for dynamic_debug.
> > > Reduc
On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 13:51 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 04:25:25AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > The recent commit to fix dynamic_debug was a bit unclean.
> > Neaten the style for dynamic_debug.
> > Reduce the stack use of message logging that uses netdev_printk
> > Add util
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:13:59AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 09:48:12PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Jim Cromie wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > >> The recent commit to fix dynamic_debug was a b
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 04:25:25AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> The recent commit to fix dynamic_debug was a bit unclean.
> Neaten the style for dynamic_debug.
> Reduce the stack use of message logging that uses netdev_printk
> Add utility functions dev_printk_emit and dev_vprintk_emit for /dev/kmsg
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 09:48:12PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Jim Cromie wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> >> The recent commit to fix dynamic_debug was a bit unclean.
> >> Neaten the style for dynamic_debug.
> >> Reduce the stack u
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Jim Cromie wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> The recent commit to fix dynamic_debug was a bit unclean.
>> Neaten the style for dynamic_debug.
>> Reduce the stack use of message logging that uses netdev_printk
>> Add utility functions
On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 11:43 -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > The recent commit to fix dynamic_debug was a bit unclean.
> > Neaten the style for dynamic_debug.
> > Reduce the stack use of message logging that uses netdev_printk
> > Add utility funct
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> The recent commit to fix dynamic_debug was a bit unclean.
> Neaten the style for dynamic_debug.
> Reduce the stack use of message logging that uses netdev_printk
> Add utility functions dev_printk_emit and dev_vprintk_emit for /dev/kmsg.
>
> Jo
From: Joe Perches
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 04:25:25 -0700
> The recent commit to fix dynamic_debug was a bit unclean.
> Neaten the style for dynamic_debug.
> Reduce the stack use of message logging that uses netdev_printk
> Add utility functions dev_printk_emit and dev_vprintk_emit for /dev/kmsg.
The recent commit to fix dynamic_debug was a bit unclean.
Neaten the style for dynamic_debug.
Reduce the stack use of message logging that uses netdev_printk
Add utility functions dev_printk_emit and dev_vprintk_emit for /dev/kmsg.
Joe Perches (5):
dev_dbg/dynamic_debug: Update to use printk_emi
18 matches
Mail list logo
