Re: [PATCH 0/5] fpga: enhancements to support non-dt code

2017-04-05 Thread Alan Tull
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 01:09:22PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Alan Tull wrote: >> > Set of patches that supports writing code that uses >> > FPGA regions

Re: [PATCH 0/5] fpga: enhancements to support non-dt code

2017-04-05 Thread Alan Tull
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 01:09:22PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Alan Tull wrote: >> > Set of patches that supports writing code that uses >> > FPGA regions without Device Tree overlays. >> >> OK here's where

Re: [PATCH 0/5] fpga: enhancements to support non-dt code

2017-03-24 Thread Moritz Fischer
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 01:09:22PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Alan Tull wrote: > > Set of patches that supports writing code that uses > > FPGA regions without Device Tree overlays. > > OK here's where I try to clarify my intention for this code.

Re: [PATCH 0/5] fpga: enhancements to support non-dt code

2017-03-24 Thread Moritz Fischer
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 01:09:22PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Alan Tull wrote: > > Set of patches that supports writing code that uses > > FPGA regions without Device Tree overlays. > > OK here's where I try to clarify my intention for this code. And > beg for

Re: [PATCH 0/5] fpga: enhancements to support non-dt code

2017-03-24 Thread Alan Tull
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Alan Tull wrote: > Set of patches that supports writing code that uses > FPGA regions without Device Tree overlays. OK here's where I try to clarify my intention for this code. And beg for reviews :) This patchset is intended as a stepping

Re: [PATCH 0/5] fpga: enhancements to support non-dt code

2017-03-24 Thread Alan Tull
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Alan Tull wrote: > Set of patches that supports writing code that uses > FPGA regions without Device Tree overlays. OK here's where I try to clarify my intention for this code. And beg for reviews :) This patchset is intended as a stepping stone towards

[PATCH 0/5] fpga: enhancements to support non-dt code

2017-03-13 Thread Alan Tull
Set of patches that supports writing code that uses FPGA regions without Device Tree overlays. Main differences from the RFC: * dropping the sysfs interface * dropping support for more than one DT overlay on a region Alan Tull (5): fpga-mgr: pass parameters for loading fpga in image info

[PATCH 0/5] fpga: enhancements to support non-dt code

2017-03-13 Thread Alan Tull
Set of patches that supports writing code that uses FPGA regions without Device Tree overlays. Main differences from the RFC: * dropping the sysfs interface * dropping support for more than one DT overlay on a region Alan Tull (5): fpga-mgr: pass parameters for loading fpga in image info