* Du, Changbin wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 09:33:15AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * changbin...@intel.com wrote:
> >
> > > Comparison of system performance: a bit drop.
> > >
> > > w/o CONFIG_DEBUG_EXPERIENCE
> > > $ time make -j4
> > > real6m43.619s
> > > user
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 09:33:15AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * changbin...@intel.com wrote:
>
> > Comparison of system performance: a bit drop.
> >
> > w/o CONFIG_DEBUG_EXPERIENCE
> > $ time make -j4
> > real6m43.619s
> > user19m5.160s
> > sys 2m20.287s
> >
* changbin...@intel.com wrote:
> Comparison of system performance: a bit drop.
>
> w/o CONFIG_DEBUG_EXPERIENCE
> $ time make -j4
> real6m43.619s
> user19m5.160s
> sys 2m20.287s
>
> w/ CONFIG_DEBUG_EXPERIENCE
> $ time make -j4
> real6m55.054s
>
From: Changbin Du
Hi all,
I know some kernel developers was searching for a method to dissable GCC
optimizations, probably they want to apply GCC '-O0' option. But since Linux
kernel replys on GCC optimization to remove some dead code, so '-O0' just
breaks the build. They do need this because the
4 matches
Mail list logo