Re: [PATCH 0/5] kmod/umh: a few fixes

2020-06-19 Thread Luis Chamberlain
Sorry it seems mutt ate my To:, so adding the folks I intended to address on the To: field now :) Luis On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 08:46:26PM +, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 05:43:48PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:49:18 + "Luis R. Rodriguez"

Re: [PATCH 0/5] kmod/umh: a few fixes

2020-06-19 Thread Luis Chamberlain
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 05:43:48PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:49:18 + "Luis R. Rodriguez" > wrote: > > > Tiezhu Yang had sent out a patch set with a slew of kmod selftest > > fixes, and one patch which modified kmod to return 254 when a module > > was not found.

Re: [PATCH 0/5] kmod/umh: a few fixes

2020-06-17 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:49:18 + "Luis R. Rodriguez" wrote: > Tiezhu Yang had sent out a patch set with a slew of kmod selftest > fixes, and one patch which modified kmod to return 254 when a module > was not found. This opened up pandora's box about why that was being > used for and low and

[PATCH 0/5] kmod/umh: a few fixes

2020-06-10 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
From: Luis Chamberlain Tiezhu Yang had sent out a patch set with a slew of kmod selftest fixes, and one patch which modified kmod to return 254 when a module was not found. This opened up pandora's box about why that was being used for and low and behold its because when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used we