Re: [PATCH 0/5] qcom-ufs: phy/hcd: Refactor phy initialization code

2017-08-13 Thread Asutosh Das (asd)
Vivek, On 8/11/2017 12:42 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: Vivek, Can you kindly review this patch series (for UFS controller changes) and consider giving your Ack so that Kishon can pull in the series through

Re: [PATCH 0/5] qcom-ufs: phy/hcd: Refactor phy initialization code

2017-08-13 Thread Asutosh Das (asd)
Vivek, On 8/11/2017 12:42 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: Vivek, Can you kindly review this patch series (for UFS controller changes) and consider giving your Ack so that Kishon can pull in the series through phy tree. SCSI piece looks

Re: [PATCH 0/5] qcom-ufs: phy/hcd: Refactor phy initialization code

2017-08-11 Thread Vivek Gautam
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > Vivek, > >> Can you kindly review this patch series (for UFS controller changes) >> and consider giving your Ack so that Kishon can pull in the series >> through phy tree. > > SCSI piece looks OK. Thank

Re: [PATCH 0/5] qcom-ufs: phy/hcd: Refactor phy initialization code

2017-08-11 Thread Vivek Gautam
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > Vivek, > >> Can you kindly review this patch series (for UFS controller changes) >> and consider giving your Ack so that Kishon can pull in the series >> through phy tree. > > SCSI piece looks OK. Thank you Martin for your review. >

Re: [PATCH 0/5] qcom-ufs: phy/hcd: Refactor phy initialization code

2017-08-10 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Vivek, > Can you kindly review this patch series (for UFS controller changes) > and consider giving your Ack so that Kishon can pull in the series > through phy tree. SCSI piece looks OK. Would still like Subhash to review the rest. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering

Re: [PATCH 0/5] qcom-ufs: phy/hcd: Refactor phy initialization code

2017-08-10 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Vivek, > Can you kindly review this patch series (for UFS controller changes) > and consider giving your Ack so that Kishon can pull in the series > through phy tree. SCSI piece looks OK. Would still like Subhash to review the rest. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering

Re: [PATCH 0/5] qcom-ufs: phy/hcd: Refactor phy initialization code

2017-08-09 Thread Vivek Gautam
Hi Martin, Subhash On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > Vivek, > > On Tuesday 08 August 2017 09:20 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: >> Hi Koshon, >> >> On 2017-08-08 17:39, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Friday 04 August 2017 12:18 PM, Vivek

Re: [PATCH 0/5] qcom-ufs: phy/hcd: Refactor phy initialization code

2017-08-09 Thread Vivek Gautam
Hi Martin, Subhash On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > Vivek, > > On Tuesday 08 August 2017 09:20 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: >> Hi Koshon, >> >> On 2017-08-08 17:39, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Friday 04 August 2017 12:18 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:

Re: [PATCH 0/5] qcom-ufs: phy/hcd: Refactor phy initialization code

2017-08-08 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Vivek, On Tuesday 08 August 2017 09:20 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Hi Koshon, > > On 2017-08-08 17:39, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Friday 04 August 2017 12:18 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: >>> Refactoring the qcom-ufs phy and host controller code to move >>> further towards the generic

Re: [PATCH 0/5] qcom-ufs: phy/hcd: Refactor phy initialization code

2017-08-08 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Vivek, On Tuesday 08 August 2017 09:20 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Hi Koshon, > > On 2017-08-08 17:39, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Friday 04 August 2017 12:18 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: >>> Refactoring the qcom-ufs phy and host controller code to move >>> further towards the generic

Re: [PATCH 0/5] qcom-ufs: phy/hcd: Refactor phy initialization code

2017-08-08 Thread Vivek Gautam
Hi Koshon, On 2017-08-08 17:39, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: Hi, On Friday 04 August 2017 12:18 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: Refactoring the qcom-ufs phy and host controller code to move further towards the generic phy usage. Right now the qcom-ufs exports a bunch of APIs that are used by the

Re: [PATCH 0/5] qcom-ufs: phy/hcd: Refactor phy initialization code

2017-08-08 Thread Vivek Gautam
Hi Koshon, On 2017-08-08 17:39, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: Hi, On Friday 04 August 2017 12:18 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: Refactoring the qcom-ufs phy and host controller code to move further towards the generic phy usage. Right now the qcom-ufs exports a bunch of APIs that are used by the

Re: [PATCH 0/5] qcom-ufs: phy/hcd: Refactor phy initialization code

2017-08-08 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Hi, On Friday 04 August 2017 12:18 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Refactoring the qcom-ufs phy and host controller code to move > further towards the generic phy usage. Right now the qcom-ufs exports > a bunch of APIs that are used by the host controller to initialize > the phy. > With this patch

Re: [PATCH 0/5] qcom-ufs: phy/hcd: Refactor phy initialization code

2017-08-08 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Hi, On Friday 04 August 2017 12:18 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Refactoring the qcom-ufs phy and host controller code to move > further towards the generic phy usage. Right now the qcom-ufs exports > a bunch of APIs that are used by the host controller to initialize > the phy. > With this patch

[PATCH 0/5] qcom-ufs: phy/hcd: Refactor phy initialization code

2017-08-04 Thread Vivek Gautam
Refactoring the qcom-ufs phy and host controller code to move further towards the generic phy usage. Right now the qcom-ufs exports a bunch of APIs that are used by the host controller to initialize the phy. With this patch series, we populate the phy_init() which was a no-op earlier. The host

[PATCH 0/5] qcom-ufs: phy/hcd: Refactor phy initialization code

2017-08-04 Thread Vivek Gautam
Refactoring the qcom-ufs phy and host controller code to move further towards the generic phy usage. Right now the qcom-ufs exports a bunch of APIs that are used by the host controller to initialize the phy. With this patch series, we populate the phy_init() which was a no-op earlier. The host