Re: [PATCH 0/5] timers: description

2005-03-29 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Same problems here with occasional hangs w/o changes to schedule_timeout. > > Bad. You are runnning 2.6.12-rc1-mm1 ? Not sure if this is really related to your patches. Its 2.6.11 with your patches extracted from mm. - To unsubscribe from this list:

Re: [PATCH 0/5] timers: description

2005-03-29 Thread Oleg Nesterov
Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Mar 2005, Chen, Kenneth W wrote: > > > I changed schedule_timeout() to call the new del_timer_sync instead of > > currently del_singleshot_timer_sync in attempt to stress these set of > > patches a bit more and I just observed a kernel hang. > > > > The sympt

RE: [PATCH 0/5] timers: description

2005-03-28 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005, Chen, Kenneth W wrote: > Oleg Nesterov wrote on March 19, 2005 17:28:48 > > These patches are updated version of 'del_timer_sync: proof of > > concept' 2 patches. > > I changed schedule_timeout() to call the new del_timer_sync instead of > currently del_singleshot_timer_sync i

Re: [PATCH 0/5] timers: description

2005-03-27 Thread Oleg Nesterov
"Chen, Kenneth W" wrote: > > Oleg Nesterov wrote on March 19, 2005 17:28:48 > > These patches are updated version of 'del_timer_sync: proof of > > concept' 2 patches. > > I changed schedule_timeout() to call the new del_timer_sync instead of > currently del_singleshot_timer_sync in attempt to stres

RE: [PATCH 0/5] timers: description

2005-03-26 Thread Chen, Kenneth W
Oleg Nesterov wrote on March 19, 2005 17:28:48 > These patches are updated version of 'del_timer_sync: proof of > concept' 2 patches. I changed schedule_timeout() to call the new del_timer_sync instead of currently del_singleshot_timer_sync in attempt to stress these set of patches a bit more and

RE: [PATCH 0/5] timers: description

2005-03-24 Thread Chen, Kenneth W
Oleg Nesterov wrote on Monday, March 21, 2005 6:19 AM > These patches are updated version of 'del_timer_sync: proof of concept' > 2 patches. Looks good performance wise. Took a quick micro benchmark measurement on a 16-node numa box (32-way). Results are pretty nice (to the expectation). Time to

[PATCH 0/5] timers: description

2005-03-19 Thread Oleg Nesterov
Hello. These patches are updated version of 'del_timer_sync: proof of concept' 2 patches. 1/5: unchanded. 2/5: del_timer_sync() simplified. It is not neccessary to unlock and retry if __TIMER_PENDING has changed, it is only neccessary if timer's base == (timer->_b