On Dec 20, 2007 10:58 PM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, testing for bisectability requires compiling each patch as its
> > applied, which gets painful for something like this where any change
> > will rebuild the world. And
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, testing for bisectability requires compiling each patch as its
> applied, which gets painful for something like this where any change
> will rebuild the world. And dealing with patch conflicts caused by
> changing early patches in the s
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> it's also a lot less frustrating and a lot more enjoyable that way IMO.
> If it's 50 small patches, then so be it ... 50 patches only take ~2
> seconds more for me to apply to x86.git (which time is immediately saved
> by the vastly improved reviewability and testability of
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But byte-for-byte identity isn't (necessarily) possible when actually
> unifying. If the same function exists in different forms on 32- and
> 64-bit, then unifying requires I pick one of them (or perhaps a new
> superset) to use in the unified
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>> found a couple of bugs.
>>>
>>> firstly, 64-bit wasnt so lucky, you broke
>>> iounmap()/change_page_attr()
>>> :-)
>>>
>> Crap. Worked for me. I'll look into it.
>>
>
> well, there's an easy solution for
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > found a couple of bugs.
> >
> > firstly, 64-bit wasnt so lucky, you broke
> > iounmap()/change_page_attr()
> > :-)
>
> Crap. Worked for me. I'll look into it.
well, there's an easy solution for unification patches: the resulting
object fi
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>> Here's another round of the pagetable unification patches. I've
>>> done a few dozen rounds of randconfig builds on both 32- and 64-bit,
>>> so I hope that will prevent compile problems in your test
>>> environment.
>>>
>>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Here's another round of the pagetable unification patches. I've done
>> a few dozen rounds of randconfig builds on both 32- and 64-bit, so I
>> hope that will prevent compile problems in your test environment.
>>
>>
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's another round of the pagetable unification patches. I've done
> a few dozen rounds of randconfig builds on both 32- and 64-bit, so I
> hope that will prevent compile problems in your test environment.
>
> I've also boot-tested 64-bit a
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> Here's another round of the pagetable unification patches. I've done
> a few dozen rounds of randconfig builds on both 32- and 64-bit, so I
> hope that will prevent compile problems in your test environment.
>
> I've also boot-t
Hi Ingo,
Here's another round of the pagetable unification patches. I've done a
few dozen rounds of randconfig builds on both 32- and 64-bit, so I hope
that will prevent compile problems in your test environment.
I've also boot-tested 64-bit and 32-bit PAE/non-PAE configs (both paravirt
and non-
11 matches
Mail list logo
