On 02/27/2017 05:45 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> On 02/24/2017 11:54 PM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
>> We get a bunch of warnings when compiling the SoCFPGA device trees with W=1.
>> This warnings happens because some nodes have a unit name but no 'reg'
>> property,
>> or are missing a unit name
On 02/27/2017 05:45 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> On 02/24/2017 11:54 PM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
>> We get a bunch of warnings when compiling the SoCFPGA device trees with W=1.
>> This warnings happens because some nodes have a unit name but no 'reg'
>> property,
>> or are missing a unit name
On 02/24/2017 11:54 PM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> We get a bunch of warnings when compiling the SoCFPGA device trees with W=1.
> This warnings happens because some nodes have a unit name but no 'reg'
> property,
> or are missing a unit name while having a 'reg' property. This series enables
>
On 02/24/2017 11:54 PM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> We get a bunch of warnings when compiling the SoCFPGA device trees with W=1.
> This warnings happens because some nodes have a unit name but no 'reg'
> property,
> or are missing a unit name while having a 'reg' property. This series enables
>
We get a bunch of warnings when compiling the SoCFPGA device trees with W=1.
This warnings happens because some nodes have a unit name but no 'reg' property,
or are missing a unit name while having a 'reg' property. This series enables to
compile all SoCFPGA dts without warnings.
Patches 1 to 5
We get a bunch of warnings when compiling the SoCFPGA device trees with W=1.
This warnings happens because some nodes have a unit name but no 'reg' property,
or are missing a unit name while having a 'reg' property. This series enables to
compile all SoCFPGA dts without warnings.
Patches 1 to 5
6 matches
Mail list logo
