Re: [PATCH 0/6] Fix for leapsecond caused hrtimer/futex issue (updated)

2012-07-12 Thread John Stultz
On 07/10/2012 04:00 PM, John Stultz wrote: On 07/10/2012 03:43 PM, John Stultz wrote: Over the weekend, Thomas got a chance to review the leap second fix in more detail and had a few additional changes he wanted to make to improve performance as well as style. So this iteration includes his mod

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Fix for leapsecond caused hrtimer/futex issue (updated)

2012-07-12 Thread John Stultz
On 07/12/2012 03:43 PM, Jiri Bohac wrote: On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:53:59PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: On 07/10/2012 03:43 PM, John Stultz wrote: Over the weekend, Thomas got a chance to review the leap second fix in more detail and had a few additional changes he wanted to make to improve perf

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Fix for leapsecond caused hrtimer/futex issue (updated)

2012-07-12 Thread Jiri Bohac
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:53:59PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > On 07/10/2012 03:43 PM, John Stultz wrote: > >Over the weekend, Thomas got a chance to review the leap second fix > >in more detail and had a few additional changes he wanted to make > >to improve performance as well as style. > > > >So

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Fix for leapsecond caused hrtimer/futex issue (updated)

2012-07-12 Thread Prarit Bhargava
On 07/11/2012 07:17 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * John Stultz wrote: > >> Over the weekend, Thomas got a chance to review the leap >> second fix in more detail and had a few additional changes he >> wanted to make to improve performance as well as style. John, FYI -- Using a mix of AMD and

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Fix for leapsecond caused hrtimer/futex issue (updated)

2012-07-11 Thread Prarit Bhargava
On 07/10/2012 06:43 PM, John Stultz wrote: > Over the weekend, Thomas got a chance to review the leap second fix > in more detail and had a few additional changes he wanted to make > to improve performance as well as style. > > So this iteration includes his modifications. > > Once merged, I'll

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Fix for leapsecond caused hrtimer/futex issue (updated)

2012-07-11 Thread Ingo Molnar
* John Stultz wrote: > Over the weekend, Thomas got a chance to review the leap > second fix in more detail and had a few additional changes he > wanted to make to improve performance as well as style. > > So this iteration includes his modifications. Yep, looks much saner now that the separ

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Fix for leapsecond caused hrtimer/futex issue (updated)

2012-07-11 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 18:43 -0400, John Stultz wrote: > Over the weekend, Thomas got a chance to review the leap second fix > in more detail and had a few additional changes he wanted to make > to improve performance as well as style. > > So this iteration includes his modifications. > > Once mer

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Fix for leapsecond caused hrtimer/futex issue (updated)

2012-07-10 Thread John Stultz
On 07/10/2012 03:43 PM, John Stultz wrote: Over the weekend, Thomas got a chance to review the leap second fix in more detail and had a few additional changes he wanted to make to improve performance as well as style. So this iteration includes his modifications. Once merged, I'll be working to

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Fix for leapsecond caused hrtimer/futex issue (updated)

2012-07-10 Thread John Stultz
On 07/10/2012 03:43 PM, John Stultz wrote: Over the weekend, Thomas got a chance to review the leap second fix in more detail and had a few additional changes he wanted to make to improve performance as well as style. So this iteration includes his modifications. Once merged, I'll be working to

[PATCH 0/6] Fix for leapsecond caused hrtimer/futex issue (updated)

2012-07-10 Thread John Stultz
Over the weekend, Thomas got a chance to review the leap second fix in more detail and had a few additional changes he wanted to make to improve performance as well as style. So this iteration includes his modifications. Once merged, I'll be working to get the backports finished as quickly as I c