On Friday, March 18, 2005 10:26 AM Grant Grundler wrote:
>> He was referring to an unpublished draft "Error Reporting ECN".
>> You'll have to talk to Intel's PCI-SIG representative to get a copy.
>
>Good News: the "Error Reporting ECN" is now posted on the PCISIG
website.
>
>Tom, please review and
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:12:07PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
...
> He was referring to an unpublished draft "Error Reporting ECN".
> You'll have to talk to Intel's PCI-SIG representative to get a copy.
Good News: the "Error Reporting ECN" is now posted on the PCISIG website.
http://ww
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:12:07PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 01:11:39PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> > Tom,
> > A co-worker made the following observation (I'm paraphrasing):
> > ...this proposal does not deal with the Error Reporting ECN.
> > For example, the
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 01:11:39PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> Tom,
> A co-worker made the following observation (I'm paraphrasing):
> ...this proposal does not deal with the Error Reporting ECN.
> For example, they do not show the advisory non-fatal bit in
> the correctable er
On Tuesday, March 15, 2005 2:38 PM Grant Grundler wrote:
>> >A co-worker made the following observation (I'm paraphrasing):
>> >...this proposal does not deal with the Error Reporting ECN.
>> >For example, they do not show the advisory non-fatal bit in
>> >the correctable error status r
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 01:54:32PM -0800, Nguyen, Tom L wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 15, 2005 12:12 PM Grant Grundler wrote:
> >Tom,
> >A co-worker made the following observation (I'm paraphrasing):
> > ...this proposal does not deal with the Error Reporting ECN.
> > For example, they do not
On Tuesday, March 15, 2005 12:12 PM Grant Grundler wrote:
>Tom,
>A co-worker made the following observation (I'm paraphrasing):
> ...this proposal does not deal with the Error Reporting ECN.
> For example, they do not show the advisory non-fatal bit in
> the correctable error stat
Tom,
A co-worker made the following observation (I'm paraphrasing):
...this proposal does not deal with the Error Reporting ECN.
For example, they do not show the advisory non-fatal bit in
the correctable error status register.
I believe he is referring to the "Error Clarif
On Friday, March 11, 2005 11:21 PM Greg KH wrote:
>>
>> -Report the errors to user.
>>
>This is done through the syslog, right? Is that acceptable?
Reporting the errors to user can be written automatically to
/var/log/messages or be manually consumed through the syslog. I am not
sure whether
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 04:10:28PM -0800, long wrote:
>
> - Report the errors to user.
This is done through the syslog, right? Is that acceptable?
It looks like you are logging a lot of stuff, all without a kernel log
level, which is going to really mess up syslog parsers.
Have you thought
PCI Express error signaling can occur on the PCI Express link itself
or on behalf of transactions initiated on the link. PCI Express
defines the Advanced Error Reporting capability, which is implemented
with a PCI Express advanced error reporting extended capability
structure, to provide more robu
11 matches
Mail list logo
