On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 18:38 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22 2016 at 4:16P -0400,
> Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 12:15 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
> > >
On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 18:38 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22 2016 at 4:16P -0400,
> Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 12:15 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2016-06-21
On Wed, Jun 22 2016 at 4:16P -0400,
Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 12:15 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 14:17 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > >
>
On Wed, Jun 22 2016 at 4:16P -0400,
Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 12:15 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 14:17 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 21 2016 at 11:44am
On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 12:15 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 14:17 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 21 2016 at 11:44am -0400,
> > > Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 12:15 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 14:17 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 21 2016 at 11:44am -0400,
> > > Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 14:17 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 21 2016 at 11:44am -0400,
>> Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> > >
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 14:17 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 21 2016 at 11:44am -0400,
>> Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 6:22pm
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 14:17 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21 2016 at 11:44am -0400,
> Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 6:22pm -0400,
> > > Mike Snitzer
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 14:17 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21 2016 at 11:44am -0400,
> Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 6:22pm -0400,
> > > Mike Snitzer wrote:
:
> > > I'm now wondering if we'd
On Tue, Jun 21 2016 at 11:44am -0400,
Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 6:22pm -0400,
> > Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 5:28pm -0400,
> > > Kani,
On Tue, Jun 21 2016 at 11:44am -0400,
Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 6:22pm -0400,
> > Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 5:28pm -0400,
> > > Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> > >
> :
> > > Looks
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:45 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:25 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
> > > wrote:
> > > >
:
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:45 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:25 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
> > > wrote:
> > > >
:
> > > > I think GENHD_FL_DAX is more
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:25 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 6:22pm -0400,
> > > Mike Snitzer wrote:
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:25 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 6:22pm -0400,
> > > Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:25 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:25 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 6:22pm -0400,
>>
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 6:22pm -0400,
>> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 5:28pm -0400,
>> > Kani, Toshimitsu
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 6:22pm -0400,
>> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 5:28pm -0400,
>> > Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
>> >
> :
>> > Looks good, I folded it
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 6:22pm -0400,
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 5:28pm -0400,
> > Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> >
:
> > Looks good, I folded it in and tested it to work.
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 6:22pm -0400,
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 5:28pm -0400,
> > Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> >
:
> > Looks good, I folded it in and tested it to work. Pushed to my 'wip'
> > branch.
> >
> >
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:34 -0600, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 6:22pm -0400,
> > Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 5:28pm -0400,
> > > Kani, Toshimitsu
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:34 -0600, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 6:22pm -0400,
> > Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 5:28pm -0400,
> > > Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> > >
> :
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 6:22pm -0400,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 5:28pm -0400,
> Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > Can you fold the following patch to the dm-linear patch?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Tsohi
> >
> > --
On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 6:22pm -0400,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 5:28pm -0400,
> Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > Can you fold the following patch to the dm-linear patch?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Tsohi
> >
> > --
> > Subject: [PATCH] dm-linear: Fix
On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 15:52 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 3:40pm -0400,
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> >
> > # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/dax/meh bs=1024K oflag=direct
> > [11729.754671] XFS (dm-4): Metadata corruption detected at
> >
On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 15:52 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 3:40pm -0400,
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> >
> > # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/dax/meh bs=1024K oflag=direct
> > [11729.754671] XFS (dm-4): Metadata corruption detected at
> > xfs_agf_read_verify+0x70/0x120 [xfs],
On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 5:28pm -0400,
Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 14:01 -0600, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 15:52 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 3:40pm -0400,
> > > Mike Snitzer
On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 5:28pm -0400,
Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 14:01 -0600, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 15:52 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 3:40pm -0400,
> > > Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >
> :
> > > > If I don't use
On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 14:01 -0600, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 15:52 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 3:40pm -0400,
> > Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >
:
> > > If I don't use XFS, and only issue IO directly to the /dev/pmem/lv, I
> > >
On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 14:01 -0600, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 15:52 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 3:40pm -0400,
> > Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >
:
> > > If I don't use XFS, and only issue IO directly to the /dev/pmem/lv, I
> > > don't see this
On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 3:40pm -0400,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/dax/meh bs=1024K oflag=direct
> [11729.754671] XFS (dm-4): Metadata corruption detected at
> xfs_agf_read_verify+0x70/0x120 [xfs], xfs_agf block 0x45a808
> [11729.766423] XFS (dm-4):
On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 3:40pm -0400,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/dax/meh bs=1024K oflag=direct
> [11729.754671] XFS (dm-4): Metadata corruption detected at
> xfs_agf_read_verify+0x70/0x120 [xfs], xfs_agf block 0x45a808
> [11729.766423] XFS (dm-4): Unmount and run
On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 14:00 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13 2016 at 6:57pm -0400,
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 13 2016 at 6:21pm -0400,
> > Toshi Kani wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > This patch-set adds DAX support to device-mapper
On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 14:00 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13 2016 at 6:57pm -0400,
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 13 2016 at 6:21pm -0400,
> > Toshi Kani wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > This patch-set adds DAX support to device-mapper dm-linear devices
> > > used by LVM. It
On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 2:31pm -0400,
Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 14:00 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >
> > I rebased your patches on linux-dm.git's 'for-next' (which includes what
> > I've already staged for the 4.8 merge window). And I folded/changed
> >
On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 2:31pm -0400,
Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 14:00 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >
> > I rebased your patches on linux-dm.git's 'for-next' (which includes what
> > I've already staged for the 4.8 merge window). And I folded/changed
> > some of the DM
On Mon, Jun 13 2016 at 6:57pm -0400,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13 2016 at 6:21pm -0400,
> Toshi Kani wrote:
>
> > This patch-set adds DAX support to device-mapper dm-linear devices
> > used by LVM. It works with LVM commands as follows:
> > -
On Mon, Jun 13 2016 at 6:57pm -0400,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13 2016 at 6:21pm -0400,
> Toshi Kani wrote:
>
> > This patch-set adds DAX support to device-mapper dm-linear devices
> > used by LVM. It works with LVM commands as follows:
> > - Creation of a logical volume with all
On Tue, Jun 14 2016 at 10:07pm -0400,
Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 14 2016 at 4:19pm -0400,
> > Jeff Moyer wrote:
> >
> >> Mike Snitzer writes:
>
On Tue, Jun 14 2016 at 10:07pm -0400,
Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 14 2016 at 4:19pm -0400,
> > Jeff Moyer wrote:
> >
> >> Mike Snitzer writes:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Jun 14 2016 at 9:50am -0400,
> >> > Jeff Moyer wrote:
> >> >
>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14 2016 at 4:19pm -0400,
> Jeff Moyer wrote:
>
>> Mike Snitzer writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Jun 14 2016 at 9:50am -0400,
>> > Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> >
>>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14 2016 at 4:19pm -0400,
> Jeff Moyer wrote:
>
>> Mike Snitzer writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Jun 14 2016 at 9:50am -0400,
>> > Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Kani, Toshimitsu" writes:
>> >>
>> >> >> I had dm-linear and md-raid0
On Tue, Jun 14 2016 at 4:19pm -0400,
Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Mike Snitzer writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 14 2016 at 9:50am -0400,
> > Jeff Moyer wrote:
> >
> >> "Kani, Toshimitsu" writes:
> >>
> >> >> I had dm-linear and
On Tue, Jun 14 2016 at 4:19pm -0400,
Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Mike Snitzer writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 14 2016 at 9:50am -0400,
> > Jeff Moyer wrote:
> >
> >> "Kani, Toshimitsu" writes:
> >>
> >> >> I had dm-linear and md-raid0 support on my list of things to look at,
> >> >> did you have raid0
Mike Snitzer writes:
> On Tue, Jun 14 2016 at 9:50am -0400,
> Jeff Moyer wrote:
>
>> "Kani, Toshimitsu" writes:
>>
>> >> I had dm-linear and md-raid0 support on my list of things to look at,
>> >> did you have raid0 in your plans?
>>
Mike Snitzer writes:
> On Tue, Jun 14 2016 at 9:50am -0400,
> Jeff Moyer wrote:
>
>> "Kani, Toshimitsu" writes:
>>
>> >> I had dm-linear and md-raid0 support on my list of things to look at,
>> >> did you have raid0 in your plans?
>> >
>> > Yes, I hope to extend further and raid0 is a good
On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 11:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14 2016 at 9:50am -0400,
> Jeff Moyer wrote:
> > "Kani, Toshimitsu" writes:
> > > > I had dm-linear and md-raid0 support on my list of things to look
> > > > at, did you have raid0 in
On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 11:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14 2016 at 9:50am -0400,
> Jeff Moyer wrote:
> > "Kani, Toshimitsu" writes:
> > > > I had dm-linear and md-raid0 support on my list of things to look
> > > > at, did you have raid0 in your plans?
> > >
> > > Yes, I hope to
On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 09:50 -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> "Kani, Toshimitsu" writes:
> > > I had dm-linear and md-raid0 support on my list of things to look at,
> > > did you have raid0 in your plans?
> >
> > Yes, I hope to extend further and raid0 is a good candidate.
>
>
On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 09:50 -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> "Kani, Toshimitsu" writes:
> > > I had dm-linear and md-raid0 support on my list of things to look at,
> > > did you have raid0 in your plans?
> >
> > Yes, I hope to extend further and raid0 is a good candidate.
>
> dm-flakey would allow
On Tue, Jun 14 2016 at 9:50am -0400,
Jeff Moyer wrote:
> "Kani, Toshimitsu" writes:
>
> >> I had dm-linear and md-raid0 support on my list of things to look at,
> >> did you have raid0 in your plans?
> >
> > Yes, I hope to extend further and raid0 is a
On Tue, Jun 14 2016 at 9:50am -0400,
Jeff Moyer wrote:
> "Kani, Toshimitsu" writes:
>
> >> I had dm-linear and md-raid0 support on my list of things to look at,
> >> did you have raid0 in your plans?
> >
> > Yes, I hope to extend further and raid0 is a good candidate.
>
> dm-flakey would
"Kani, Toshimitsu" writes:
>> I had dm-linear and md-raid0 support on my list of things to look at,
>> did you have raid0 in your plans?
>
> Yes, I hope to extend further and raid0 is a good candidate.
dm-flakey would allow more xfstests test cases to run. I'd say that's
"Kani, Toshimitsu" writes:
>> I had dm-linear and md-raid0 support on my list of things to look at,
>> did you have raid0 in your plans?
>
> Yes, I hope to extend further and raid0 is a good candidate.
dm-flakey would allow more xfstests test cases to run. I'd say that's
more important than
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
>> On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 16:18 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>>> Thanks Toshi!
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Toshi Kani
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
>> On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 16:18 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>>> Thanks Toshi!
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Toshi Kani wrote:
>>> >
>>> > This patch-set adds DAX support to
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 16:18 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Thanks Toshi!
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Toshi Kani wrote:
>> >
>> > This patch-set adds DAX support to device-mapper dm-linear
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 16:18 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Thanks Toshi!
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Toshi Kani wrote:
>> >
>> > This patch-set adds DAX support to device-mapper dm-linear devices
>> > used by LVM. It works
On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 16:18 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Thanks Toshi!
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> >
> > This patch-set adds DAX support to device-mapper dm-linear devices
> > used by LVM. It works with LVM commands as follows:
> > - Creation
On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 16:18 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Thanks Toshi!
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> >
> > This patch-set adds DAX support to device-mapper dm-linear devices
> > used by LVM. It works with LVM commands as follows:
> > - Creation of a logical volume
Thanks Toshi!
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> This patch-set adds DAX support to device-mapper dm-linear devices
> used by LVM. It works with LVM commands as follows:
> - Creation of a logical volume with all DAX capable devices (such
>as pmem) sets
Thanks Toshi!
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> This patch-set adds DAX support to device-mapper dm-linear devices
> used by LVM. It works with LVM commands as follows:
> - Creation of a logical volume with all DAX capable devices (such
>as pmem) sets the logical volume
On Mon, Jun 13 2016 at 6:21pm -0400,
Toshi Kani wrote:
> This patch-set adds DAX support to device-mapper dm-linear devices
> used by LVM. It works with LVM commands as follows:
> - Creation of a logical volume with all DAX capable devices (such
>as pmem) sets the
On Mon, Jun 13 2016 at 6:21pm -0400,
Toshi Kani wrote:
> This patch-set adds DAX support to device-mapper dm-linear devices
> used by LVM. It works with LVM commands as follows:
> - Creation of a logical volume with all DAX capable devices (such
>as pmem) sets the logical volume DAX
This patch-set adds DAX support to device-mapper dm-linear devices
used by LVM. It works with LVM commands as follows:
- Creation of a logical volume with all DAX capable devices (such
as pmem) sets the logical volume DAX capable as well.
- Once a logical volume is set to DAX capable, the
This patch-set adds DAX support to device-mapper dm-linear devices
used by LVM. It works with LVM commands as follows:
- Creation of a logical volume with all DAX capable devices (such
as pmem) sets the logical volume DAX capable as well.
- Once a logical volume is set to DAX capable, the
68 matches
Mail list logo