Re: [PATCH 0/6] kill i386 and x86_64 directories

2007-10-26 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:23:36 +0200 Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:17:53PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > I think the last remaining bit to cleanup is the symlink from > > arch/x86/boot/bzImage. Now that the old directories are gone it does > > not make

Re: [PATCH 0/6] kill i386 and x86_64 directories

2007-10-26 Thread Alan Cox
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:23:36 +0200 Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:17:53PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > I think the last remaining bit to cleanup is the symlink from > > arch/x86/boot/bzImage. Now that the old directories are gone it does > > not make

Re: [PATCH 0/6] kill i386 and x86_64 directories

2007-10-25 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:17:53PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > I think the last remaining bit to cleanup is the symlink from > arch/x86/boot/bzImage. Now that the old directories are gone it does > not make much sense to keep them alive. Andrew will survive it :) It is not just Andrew I'm a

Re: [PATCH 0/6] kill i386 and x86_64 directories

2007-10-25 Thread Bodo Eggert
Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think the last remaining bit to cleanup is the symlink from > arch/x86/boot/bzImage. BTW: Is it useful to have (b)zimage under $ARCH while vmlinux is in the root dir? (Besides being compatible to external scripts) -- I always tell customers/clients

Re: [PATCH 0/6] kill i386 and x86_64 directories

2007-10-25 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:19:40PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > > Because: > > 1) It sort of finishes the initial merge > > 2) Any breakage should be easy to trigger (build breakage) and easy to fix. > > > > It is 1) that make me say this is -rc1 materail, > > and 2) that say that this is an accept

Re: [PATCH 0/6] kill i386 and x86_64 directories

2007-10-25 Thread Kay Sievers
On 10/25/07, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 09:56:44PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > This series kill the old i386 and x86_64 directories. > > The relevant files are moved and adapted and > > Kconfig.debug was consolidated (thanks to Randy). > > > > I had to modi

Re: [PATCH 0/6] kill i386 and x86_64 directories

2007-10-25 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Sam, On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > This series kill the old i386 and x86_64 directories. > The relevant files are moved and adapted and > Kconfig.debug was consolidated (thanks to Randy). > > I had to modify both the top-lvel Makefile and the kconfig > Makefile to accomplish this. It

Re: [PATCH 0/6] kill i386 and x86_64 directories

2007-10-25 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 09:56:44PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > This series kill the old i386 and x86_64 directories. > The relevant files are moved and adapted and > Kconfig.debug was consolidated (thanks to Randy). > > I had to modify both the top-lvel Makefile and the kconfig > Makefile to acco

[PATCH 0/6] kill i386 and x86_64 directories

2007-10-25 Thread Sam Ravnborg
This series kill the old i386 and x86_64 directories. The relevant files are moved and adapted and Kconfig.debug was consolidated (thanks to Randy). I had to modify both the top-lvel Makefile and the kconfig Makefile to accomplish this. It was done in such a way that it is trivial for other archs