On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 07:10:56PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I tested this patch manually with a small C test program and asm.
>
> Would you please prepare a patch to kvm-unit-tests that stresses the new
> codepath?
Ha, now that you bring that up, I think Andre already had something
ready.
Il 22/09/2013 16:44, Borislav Petkov ha scritto:
> From: Borislav Petkov
>
> Alriiight,
>
> here's another version of the patchset, hopefully addressing all review
> feedback from last time. 6/6 is the respective qemu patch to handle
> emulated features query, etc.
>
> It is still a lot of fun
Il 22/09/2013 16:44, Borislav Petkov ha scritto:
From: Borislav Petkov b...@suse.de
Alriiight,
here's another version of the patchset, hopefully addressing all review
feedback from last time. 6/6 is the respective qemu patch to handle
emulated features query, etc.
It is still a lot of
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 07:10:56PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
I tested this patch manually with a small C test program and asm.
Would you please prepare a patch to kvm-unit-tests that stresses the new
codepath?
Ha, now that you bring that up, I think Andre already had something
ready.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 01:36:03PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git queue branch.
Ok, they still apply.
I'm sending 4 and 5 (5 needed changes too) as a reply to this message.
> That's why we got "max users limit is reached" error! (only for the
> first
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:28:24PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:35:24PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > If everything still applies patch 4 resend should be fine.
>
> Which tree should they still apply to?
>
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git queue branch.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:35:24PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> If everything still applies patch 4 resend should be fine.
Which tree should they still apply to?
> Yeah, kvm forum was not at the same building as LinuxCon :(
Yep, I know. We did go to the kvm forum to use the wifi there because
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:30:03AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:53:00AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > Except a small nitpick for patch 4 this looks good to me. No need to
> > wait for QEMU cpu parsing code to change to apply it.
>
> Ok, want a resend or rather a
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:53:00AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> Except a small nitpick for patch 4 this looks good to me. No need to
> wait for QEMU cpu parsing code to change to apply it.
Ok, want a resend or rather a pull request or only patch 4 resend?
Btw, we kinda missed each other in
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 04:44:49PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov
>
> Alriiight,
>
> here's another version of the patchset, hopefully addressing all review
> feedback from last time. 6/6 is the respective qemu patch to handle
> emulated features query, etc.
>
Except a
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 04:44:49PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
From: Borislav Petkov b...@suse.de
Alriiight,
here's another version of the patchset, hopefully addressing all review
feedback from last time. 6/6 is the respective qemu patch to handle
emulated features query, etc.
Except
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:53:00AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Except a small nitpick for patch 4 this looks good to me. No need to
wait for QEMU cpu parsing code to change to apply it.
Ok, want a resend or rather a pull request or only patch 4 resend?
Btw, we kinda missed each other in
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:30:03AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:53:00AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Except a small nitpick for patch 4 this looks good to me. No need to
wait for QEMU cpu parsing code to change to apply it.
Ok, want a resend or rather a pull
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:35:24PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
If everything still applies patch 4 resend should be fine.
Which tree should they still apply to?
Yeah, kvm forum was not at the same building as LinuxCon :(
Yep, I know. We did go to the kvm forum to use the wifi there because
the
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:28:24PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:35:24PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
If everything still applies patch 4 resend should be fine.
Which tree should they still apply to?
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git queue branch.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 01:36:03PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git queue branch.
Ok, they still apply.
I'm sending 4 and 5 (5 needed changes too) as a reply to this message.
That's why we got max users limit is reached error! (only for the
first half
From: Borislav Petkov
Alriiight,
here's another version of the patchset, hopefully addressing all review
feedback from last time. 6/6 is the respective qemu patch to handle
emulated features query, etc.
It is still a lot of fun to generate fast! Atom 32-bit SMP guests like
this:
[
From: Borislav Petkov b...@suse.de
Alriiight,
here's another version of the patchset, hopefully addressing all review
feedback from last time. 6/6 is the respective qemu patch to handle
emulated features query, etc.
It is still a lot of fun to generate fast! Atom 32-bit SMP guests like
this:
[
18 matches
Mail list logo
