On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:46:18AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:37:08 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > Virtio 1.0 doesn't include a modern balloon device.
> > At some point we'll likely define an incompatible interface with a different
> > ID. But for now, it's
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:37:08 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> Virtio 1.0 doesn't include a modern balloon device.
> At some point we'll likely define an incompatible interface with a different
> ID. But for now, it's not a big change to support a transitional balloon
> device: this has the
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:37:08 +0200
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
Virtio 1.0 doesn't include a modern balloon device.
At some point we'll likely define an incompatible interface with a different
ID. But for now, it's not a big change to support a transitional balloon
device: this
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:46:18AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:37:08 +0200
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
Virtio 1.0 doesn't include a modern balloon device.
At some point we'll likely define an incompatible interface with a different
ID. But for now,
Virtio 1.0 doesn't include a modern balloon device.
At some point we'll likely define an incompatible interface with a different
ID. But for now, it's not a big change to support a transitional balloon
device: this has the advantage of supporting existing drivers, transparently.
The only issue
Virtio 1.0 doesn't include a modern balloon device.
At some point we'll likely define an incompatible interface with a different
ID. But for now, it's not a big change to support a transitional balloon
device: this has the advantage of supporting existing drivers, transparently.
The only issue
6 matches
Mail list logo
