Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Doesn't this move printk-debug control from local source files
> (i.e., targeted, specific ones) to a more global control (DEBUG)?
>
> If so, I don't see that as a generally good thing.
>
> If not, please correct me and tell me how this is useful to just
> one insta
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:18:31 +0100 Jack Stone wrote:
> This patch series replaces DPRINTK with pr_debug in alternative.c,
> autofs, autofs4
> and ncpfs. A new function called pr_err is also added to keep
> functionality in
> ncpfs. The last 2 patches add support for pr_debug_pid and apply it to
>
Jack Stone wrote:
> This patch series replaces DPRINTK with pr_debug in alternative.c,
> autofs, autofs4
> and ncpfs. A new function called pr_err is also added to keep
> functionality in
> ncpfs. The last 2 patches add support for pr_debug_pid and apply it to
> autofs4 to
> keep the output the sam
Ian Kent wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 23:18 +0100, Jack Stone wrote:
>> This patch series replaces DPRINTK with pr_debug in alternative.c,
>> autofs, autofs4
>> and ncpfs. A new function called pr_err is also added to keep
>> functionality in
>> ncpfs. The last 2 patches add support for pr_debug_
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 23:18 +0100, Jack Stone wrote:
> This patch series replaces DPRINTK with pr_debug in alternative.c,
> autofs, autofs4
> and ncpfs. A new function called pr_err is also added to keep
> functionality in
> ncpfs. The last 2 patches add support for pr_debug_pid and apply it to
> a
This patch series replaces DPRINTK with pr_debug in alternative.c,
autofs, autofs4
and ncpfs. A new function called pr_err is also added to keep
functionality in
ncpfs. The last 2 patches add support for pr_debug_pid and apply it to
autofs4 to
keep the output the same as the current DPRINTK stateme
6 matches
Mail list logo
